Customizable Environment field at 'Add New Cycle' form
I would prefer to restrict the environments the teams use when creating a test cycle. Currently it is a text field and teams are defining as per their convenience which is causing issue in generating the report. It would be a good option to have a custom environment field which has predefined list of values to select from when creating the test cycle and it should be a mandatory field.praveenpatil5 months agoNew MemberNew Idea2Views0likes0Commentsextract data based on executedOn field - API or /and searching option
1/ new API to download test execution data based on execution date/range for single/multiple projects/releases 2/ add "ExecutedOn" into searching bar in advanced view (please find attached screenshot). Such data will be very helpful to generate reporting and KPIs metricsgc814395 months agoRegular VisitorNew Idea15Views0likes0CommentsCloned requirements should not get updated between different release within the project
Even though the requirement ID is same on different releases within the project, the updates to requirements in newer release (i.e., 1.1) should not be reflected in older release (i.e., 1.0). This issue impacts the requirement and corresponding mapped test cases in the earlier release/s. This also impacts other use case where if we plan to start the work on another new release while the present release is in progress within the project. This issue is more problematic to review and trace the test cases against the mapped requirements and requirement against the mapped test cases. This also becomes problematic during audits or if someone in the team updates the requirements unintentionally. Since version of the requirements is not present now, we should plan to have this enhancement in Zephyr.KiranR6 months agoOccasional VisitorNew Idea18Views0likes0CommentsZephyr Enterprise Vortex automation job should support JUnit files generated by robot framework
Robot framework is an industry wide standard test automation framework. Currently, Zephyr Enterprise Vortex jobs do not support JUnit output files generated by robot framework directly, thus, resulting in a parsing error or all test cases to be pass. The robot framework generates a JUNit output file containing self closing failure and property tags (<failure.../> and <property .. />) When passing this file to a Suite automation job, it results in a parsing error since Zephyr expects the Junit file to have <failure></failure> and <property></property> tags. This creates a lot of overhead of converting the robot framework generated JUnit files to a format that is accepted by Zephyr vortex. It would be helpful if Vortex jobs supports the JUnit results file directly generated by robot framework.rsaxena5 months agoRegular Visitor32Views0likes2CommentsImprove Dashboard export
Alot of the dashboards in ZE are interactive, when hoving oer we see more metrics and information etc However when exporting ZE exports only a snapshot of the data, no metrics are included and its not clear how teh data is represented when you download an image or PDF As a user I would like to see a metric/data breakdown of what each gadget representsvinniew7 months agoStaffNew Idea4Views0likes0Commentsincrease phase level reporting
As a user I would like to able to report better on phase level stats some projects only create one cycle and each plan is designed using phases As a result im unable to gauge this information clearly in the Dashboards as a lot of the dashbaords will only report on cycle information and not phase datavinniew7 months agoStaffNew Idea1View0likes0CommentsTagging for email Notification in comments section of test cases
In the comment section of a test case it would be a nice option to be able to add a Someone tag that would email the person tagged. This can be handy for edits, reviews, approvals and so forth. This is a common feature in other tools.TestMaster227 months agoNew ContributorNew Idea2Views0likes0CommentsTest case mapping when uploading
I have automated mapping to requirement via automation. It would be good when uploading functional test cases you can add the mapping key in the upload for it to automatically map. We have functional test cases that are story level but the automation maps to the requirements.travisZE8 months agoNew MemberNew Idea9Views0likes0CommentsAdditional test case details for email notification when test case is assigned
As a user receiving an email notification that a test case has been assigned to me, I'd like to see more details directly in the email such as the title/name of the test case, a link to open the test case, etc. OLD ID :- ZENT-I-167New Idea9Views0likes0CommentsAllocate Mapped Test Case Automatically
Hi, It would be great when a requirement(s) is allocated to a release from a project, that the application automatically allocates all the test case(s) that are mapped to the requirement(s). This will help us to make sure that we don't miss any test case associated to the requirement.Bhagvat868 months agoNew ContributorNew Idea3Views0likes0CommentsEmail Notification when I get a test execution assigned
As a user, I want to receive an email notification When a test execution was assigned to me To know that I have test work to do. The email should list links to all test cases, that are assigned to me.MerlinZauberer8 months agoOccasional VisitorNew Idea4Views0likes0CommentsAbility to reorder folders and entities.
Creating folder hierarchies and organizing test sets/cases/requirements etc is a large part of keeping our repos clean and legible. Without the ability to reorder these folders and entities we are forced to use alphabetical prefix that make reading folders more difficult at a glance, or be stuck with disorganized cases (or manually adding them to sets one by one in the right order for potentially thousands of cases) because a new test case was added that is showing in last place when it should come after the 50th case for example. Added an example below with names for visibility, Test Case 1 and 2 were initially created, and then a new feature or change order came in that added a new case (1.5). In our ordering, 1.5 comes before 2 can be run but because it was created later it's automatically sent to the bottom (sorted by ID). Again our option becomes to prefix them with an ordering of IDs and sort by name which is much more tedious and harder to manage. It becomes especially rough when it comes in 50-100-200+ test cases later, or finding it afterwards to create execution sets.cmcbride9 months agoFrequent VisitorNew Idea3Views0likes0CommentsAdd ability for child test cases to all be viewed when selecting parent folder.
Currently you can only see test cases when selecting the folder they are created under, when using folders for organizational structure it means having to drill down several times before seeing any content and makes large scale moving/editing/cloning/sharing take large amounts of time. There should be an option to have all child test cases (that exist anywhere under that parent) be visible when selecting a parent folder. This should also include even the release folder showing ALL test cases in the release. Create a small visual below regarding Test Case repo but it should apply to all areas with folder structures. This should probably be a toggleable setting if people use multi-level case structures within parents and don't want all cases in sub-folders brought up.cmcbride9 months agoFrequent VisitorNew Idea8Views0likes0Commentsimprove the triggering of test automation with github-actions
TLDR: As a user I can trigger the test execution manually by pressing the 'E' button. But I also want to trigger it from Github-actions. Therefore I would like Z.E. to automatically append testcases from test executions to the releaseTestScheduleId's parameter in the rest call I use to trigger the execution. Rest call can be found below: Background: I want to use Z.E. to manage my automated tests and want to use Github-actions to trigger the automated tests that are linked in a test execution. I only want to run the tests that are in the test execution to have full control of testing effort. In order to trigger test execution PR-001: from Github-actions we need to implement following Rest-request using the cURL obtained from Z.E. This will execute the tests that are defined in the test execution based upon the releaseTestScheduleId's. However, this is hardcoded and needs to be updated when adding or removing testscases to the test execution. e.g. if i add a new test to the execution, i need to manually include the releaseTestScheduleId to the testcaseExecutionList in this rest call. It would be nice if the releaseTestsScheduleId's in the testcaseExecutionList are not needed. It would be easier if i only need a link to the folder that contains the testcases. Or a redirect to this Get request could also give the releaseTestScheduleId's: This would mean that only the automated tests are run that are defined in the test execution without the need to manually update the Github-action. As a tester it would simplify testing.dd_1239 months agoSenior MemberNew Idea21Views0likes0CommentsRemove "Change Password" option in "User Profile" dropdown when using other authentication
Currently when using another authentication such as SSO, the User Profile drop down provides the external user with the Change Password option. Though this feature only applies to the internal user and authentication. Therefore, it should not be made available for external users. Please remove the "Change Password" option for external users.CGangloff10 months agoModeratorNew Idea23Views0likes0CommentsAbility to map one Zephyr project to multiple Jira projects
As a manager working on a project that uses multiple Jira projects for different teams, I'd like to be able to manage all these Jira projects from a single Zephyr project. As part of this, I'd expect to be able to import requirements from these Jira projects, as well as file defects into any of these Jira projects. OLD ID :-ZENT-I-17New Idea34Views0likes0CommentsUnderstanding of using Curl API command and create a HTML report for the test stats
Understanding of using Curl API command and create a HTML report for the test stats We would like to understand how to user the culr command in Zephyr API, so we can use it to grab the test stats for the various project and display in a HTML pageNew Idea117Views0likes0CommentsDashboard Gadget - Manual vs Automated data for Project Repo
Add a gadget to show the percentage of automated and manual test cases for Project RepositoriesAccepted for Discussion102Views0likes1CommentCreating BDD test cases in Zephyr and use it for the Test Automation
Hi, We would like to understand the following steps How to create BDD test cases (Gherkin format test cases) directly in Zephyr What add-in to be installed in order to get the Zephyr to support BDD Integration of Zephyr with Jira, so that this will help to create BDD test scenarios in Jira and directly import into Zephyr So, the understanding of the above steps will help us our route to test automation effectivelyNew Idea104Views0likes0CommentsREST API to pull all Test Case Data including Test Steps and Custom Fields with a single request
Currently, if we want to pull back all Test Case data we have to make multiple API requests to pull back the Test Steps associated to a test case and then another call to pull back any custom fields associated to a test case. So. if we need to pull the test data for 100 test cases, we need to make 200 API calls. In the below example, if we pull all the test cases associated to a single JIRA story that is one API request. Then for each Test Case returned in that initial API request, we need to pull the Test Steps for each Test Case and then we need to pull the Custom Field data for each test case. We suggest having a REST API request that can pull back all Test Case data including the Test Steps and any Custom Field data in a single transaction. This will help reduce the backend traffic when using the REST API for custom reporting. In addition, it would be beneficial to be able to pull back Test Case data in bulk, allowing us to provide multiple Test Cases to the request and get all of their associated data including test steps and custom field data in a single request. To avoid performance issues the bulk request could be limited to a specific number of Test Cases per request.josh202311 months agoRegular Visitor95Views0likes0CommentsZEPHYR Improvement - Planned Vs Executed Dashboard Gadget - Request to add to the Phases level
ZEPHYR Improvement - Planned Vs Executed Dashboard Gadget - Request to add to the Phases level As a Zephyr User, I would like to add "Planned Vs Executed" gadget into my dashboard and configure the dashboard to Phases level At the moment, this is only allowed to configure to the Cycle level, so we can only see the consolidated view of the cycle.Accepted for Discussion107Views0likes1CommentZephyr planning component improvements
The Zephyr planning component is used for building test cycles. Some potential improvements spring to mind... 1. Ability to drag and drop folders in a test cycle 2. When doing a sync against the test repository, allow the ability to filter (eg to exclude tests that are not to be copied overs) 3. Default to assigning new tests to 'Anyone' rather than 'Unassigned' 4. If we add a test plan from existing structure, then we are unable to update the Folders once that are created.New Idea94Views0likes0CommentsZephyr export improvements
The Zephyr export functionality needs to be massively improved, if the content it produces is to be useful. I tend to default to exporting everything in xls format as the other formats are not useful. Currently any exports need much manipulation in Excel before they can be used for reporting. Here are some suggestions: 1. No empty cells - if a row is a continuation of content from the previous row (eg another test step, or a reference to a requirement traceability or attachment), then carry forward the test identification information onto that row 2. The export generates some cells that are completely content empty, however the Excel isblank() function reports false for those cells. 3. Provide the ability to return the content all on one tab, rather than a new tab for each folder 4. Massively improve the report generation speedNew Idea104Views0likes0CommentsZephyr report record count issues
The record counts on the Zephyr reports do not match the counts in the folders themselves.New Idea138Views0likes1CommentDashboard gadget should allow to take the following stats from the Sub folder level as well
Dashboard gadget should allow to take the following stats not only from the Top folder level but also from the sub folder level Test Repository at Sub folder level Number of Test cases planned for automation Number of Test cases automated Test Execution at Sub Folder levelAccepted for Discussion83Views0likes1CommentJira - ZephyrEnterprise app, need some configuration options
To get any Zephyr information to show up in Jira, I need to (for every single ticket/issue) click on the elipsis menu to enable the traceability report widget, and then click Load Report. The Load Report is cumbersome enough, but i'm finding this integration unusable when you combine that with hiding the integration altogether in the issues. Please consider adding the ability to auto-display Zephyr stats on a per-project basis. OR just load it for anything with matching testcases, and autoload the traceability report (or have autoload be a setting). Some kind of change is necessary regardless, because the integration as it stands now definitely falls short of what we need.naniel12 months agoOccasional VisitorNew Idea80Views0likes0CommentsAdd support for Test Scenarios with Variables (e.g. BDD style) for users with Jira Cloud
We have users who have manual test scenarios, where there are steps to be repeated many times, but with different variables inserted and different results checked for, similar to, but more complex than the example below: Given a user navigates to OurApplication_login_screen When I enter Username as <username> and Password as <password> Then the Home_Screen should be displayed And the text Welcome <friendly_name> should be in the header Examples |username | password | friendly_name | |username1 | password_1 | User One | |username2 | password_2 | User Two | |username3 | password_3 | User Three | Apparently Zephyr Enterprise supports tracking these types of scenarios only if customers are using an on-prem version of Jira, but not if using Jira Cloud. We'd like this capability added/expanded for users of Jira Cloud (as we're NOT going to go back to hosting Jira on-prem!).BrianDallHMH12 months agoNew Contributor90Views0likes0CommentsMake environment field not required field for test case uploading
In version 7.19 when uploading test cases via Excel sheet, the Environment field is a required field for Mapping. This should not be required field as not all use cases require this and should allow flexibility for the user.Preetpal12 months agoMemberNew Idea90Views0likes0CommentsTest Execution app of Zephyr project on mobile device (tablet or phone)
An app available of Zephyr Enterprise to access only the Test Execution section of a project and release selected. This would allow field engineers and on site testers (automated warehouses, hospitals, pharmceutical industries, aerospace, so on) where it is impractical for testing to be done from office and requires to be on hand and near the physical equipment. Potential to open Zephyr Enterprise to more markets and more opportunities.Preetpal12 months agoMemberNew Idea97Views0likes0CommentsComponent picklist sync from Jira project
As Administrator, I need the option to sync the Jira project component list with the component list I hold in ZE project. It is hard to maintain the components list in two different locations, if ZE want to be fully integrated with Jira this is default requirement.eran12 months agoSenior MemberNew Idea100Views0likes0CommentsChange the Create defect Application list to a dropdown with Search function
In Zephyr Enterprise in the Defect section there is a field for Applications where a list of all applications is shown from Jira side, and this will grow to a very long list eventually as the projects progress. Change instead to a dropdown list which also provides Search functionality similar to how it is implemented in Jira today. That will provide easier and faster possibility to match the application when creating a defect.annfar2 years agoSenior MemberNew Idea106Views0likes0CommentsAdd more field filters to Dashboard report/chart
Dashboard reports fields are very limited in current version. Though there are some types of report we can created, they have very limited field filters available to users. For e.g. most reports can only set field display/filters in projects, releases or cycles, it is not flexible for most scenarios. I suggest user is able to create a type of user defined dashboard/report. User will be able to add any fields(including user defined fields)/indicators into the report, and able to set filters to the report. Basically it will be used like an Excel pivot table/chat.gc814392 years agoRegular VisitorNew Idea85Views0likes0CommentsCustom field should provide customizable font color
To have a better overview of values of a custom field (e.g. Type: picklist) it also should be possible to set the font color of different values. In my case I want to add a custom field of the pick list type with three different values and for each value I want to have a different color. This would help to improve clarity. of a test case.mum4bosch2 years agoNew ContributorNew Idea135Views0likes0CommentsCreate read-only admin role for REST API requests
Many of the REST API requests under /projects, /users, etc. require admin level permissions to execute. The issue is if a user has admin level permissions they can also execute create, update and delete requests. There are situations where management needs the ability to execute the GET requests associated to these admin level API for reporting purposes. However, there is too much risk to give these users full admin privilages. It would be beneficial if there was a "read-only" admin role that could be assigned to an account that would allow them to only execute the GET requests for these admin level REST API requests.josh20232 years agoRegular VisitorNew Idea102Views0likes0CommentsAbility to differentiate between a UI and REST API request and see account making the request
Current when viewing the logs there is no way to see if a request is coming from the Zephyr Enterprise UI or the Zephyr Enterprise REST API. In addition, there is no way to see the account making a REST API request. In order to better control access and to identify "abusers" (i.e. user overloading the system with requests causing a backlog in the queue) it would be beneficial if we could differentiate between a UI request vs. a REST API request. It would be further beneficial to be able see which account is make a REST API request.josh20232 years agoRegular VisitorNew Idea92Views0likes0CommentsProvide Rate Limiting in Zephyr Enterprise for integration with Jira
Jira has the ability to rate limit linked applications (i.e. Zephyr Enterprise). However, when this is enabled requests from Zephyr Enterprise to Jira (i.e. Test Case mapped to a Requirement linked to a Jira issue, Test Execution status updated associated to a Test Case mapped to a Requirement linked to a Jira issue, etc.) can build up in the queue. If the queue grows too large over multiple days, Zephyr Enterprise CPU and Memory can hit capacity making the system unresponsive at worst or updates in Jira are delayed by days.Further, if any automation is developed that uses the Zephyr Enterprise REST API requests at volume, the queue can also increase impacting users using the UI. It would be beneficial to be able to rate limit any Zephyr Enterprise actions that would cause communication with Jira to minimize the backlog of queued requests.josh20232 years agoRegular VisitorNew Idea96Views0likes0CommentsOption to default new projects to a specific Jira integration connection
As an Admin managing several new projects, I'd like the ability to pick a default Jira integration so that when I create a new project, the Jira integration is automatically selected. OLD ID :-ZENT-I-210New Idea155Views0likes0CommentsSupport for 'lookup list' custom fields
Currently, if I update the list of values for a picklist custom field, those values are automatically updated in the assets where they are used. For example, if I update a priority field from 'P1' to 'Blocker', all test cases that use 'P1' will automatically reflect the new value 'Blocker. This is useful, but there are use-cases where this is not desirable: for custom fields where the options can change over time. For example, at my company I use a custom field 'ProjectName' for all active projects across the company (potentially hundreds/thousands). But as old projects are deprecated and new ones started, I need to update the list of values without impacting the test cases that use the old values. Thus, as an Admin, I'd like to option to create such type of custom fields (which are called 'lookup list'), for which the options can change over time but the values stored in Zephyr are stored as text and remain fixed. OLD ID :-ZENT-I-253New Idea115Views0likes0CommentsConfirmation / Alert message before confirming an action in Zephyr
Could you please add a Confirmation ("Are you sure you want to move this folder?) form when a whole folder Move takes place. This could prevent accidental moving of folders or make users think twice about what they are doing. OLD ID :-ZENT-I-471New Idea108Views0likes0CommentsAdvanceSearch API to return custom field values instead of index
Currently, when we pull data from the advanceSearch API endpoint, the custom picklist fields returned include the index value instead of the actual value, making it hard for us to post-process the data - we need to lookup the actual value for each custom field with extra API calls. We need an option to have the API return the actual custom field values so that we don't need the additional lookups. OLD ID :-ZENT-I-285New Idea116Views0likes0CommentsZETM field update - Required field in Test Cases moved to the top of the screen
Our ZETM received the following ZETM request: Request to reorganize the screen for Test cases with required fields as the first fields in the ticket. Placing the 3 required fields. MOTS id, Progression/Regression/ Test Phase as the first fields seen will promote completion of requested data. The ZETM projects that I have access to and have seen the Test Case fields are Lab RTM and Northrim Program. In both cases, the list of fields is in alphabetical order and the required fields are sprinkled throughout. Can these be re-ordered to show the required fields at the top? OLD ID :-ZENT-I-484New Idea105Views0likes0CommentsZETM field update - rename the Test Phase field in Test Cases
The ZETM received the following request from the user community: Request the renaming of the "Test Phase" field in Test Cases to "Planned Test Phase" or something that gets at the original use of the required field. In a Test Case: the field Test Phase can be confused with Test Phase in Test planning, these are named the same but not related. The 2 uses of the name Test Phase are unrelated and may cause confusion. The Test Phase field is a required field in every ZETM project that I have seen. For example in the Lab RTM or Northrim Program ZETM projects, it appears. OLD ID :-ZENT-I-485New Idea110Views0likes0CommentsIntegrate ZETM with a BI tool (BizOps or Power BI)
Northrim users in ZETM are under pressure from management for better reporting options for defect burndown. Is there an opportunity for ZETM to feed a datalake for third party tools to analyze and create reports? OLD ID :-ZENT-I-451New Idea118Views0likes0Comments