Perhaps it would just be sufficient to confirm that the larger image changed?
Hi Marsha_R, sadly in my case too many operations that can affect the 3D to change and therefore the test would not be precise enough.
I understand that what i want to achieve is probably far fetched but still wanted to check if by any change it was possible.
If not ill try other approaches or leave those kind of test as manual tests.
I've come across similar situations in the past where where it was quicker to look at the image/text/etc. in question than it was to code a test to do it. We typically did those tests at the beginning of the test cycle in order to leave time for fixes and then checked again at the end to make sure everything was still ok.
That makes sense. Thank you for sharing this suggestion!
