marin
12 years agoFrequent Contributor
Questions about object driven testing log tree
Hello all,
I am using object driven testing approach in my project and so far it has proven to be robust and reliable.
However there is a couple of questions that I'd like to ask about logging for ODT scenarios.
1. it seems as if nested structure and naming of the log for ODT runs can not be influenced. What I'd like to achieve is to have a possibility to give a transparent name to the single ODT runs in the top level of the run logs.
Instead of "Item0" -> "Item16" it would be helpful to see the real test description (which I declared as "ID" property of ODT object) without actually having to drill down to see what the case really was. Is this somehow possible (see screenshot 1)
2. Apparently there is always one additional empty run logged -> without any action. No matter how many runs there are, logged will be always one more (see screenshot 2).
Is this per design?
Many thanks,
Marin
I am using object driven testing approach in my project and so far it has proven to be robust and reliable.
However there is a couple of questions that I'd like to ask about logging for ODT scenarios.
1. it seems as if nested structure and naming of the log for ODT runs can not be influenced. What I'd like to achieve is to have a possibility to give a transparent name to the single ODT runs in the top level of the run logs.
Instead of "Item0" -> "Item16" it would be helpful to see the real test description (which I declared as "ID" property of ODT object) without actually having to drill down to see what the case really was. Is this somehow possible (see screenshot 1)
2. Apparently there is always one additional empty run logged -> without any action. No matter how many runs there are, logged will be always one more (see screenshot 2).
Is this per design?
Many thanks,
Marin