Hmm.. I looked at both of those options, but I didn't think either of those would help, as the basic image is a different size (because of the resolution). On my host PC, it's say, 850x750 ... but on the smaller resolution of the remote machine, it's only 800x706. No amount of masking, or tolerances (unless the tolerances are so large that it effectively could be a picture of micky mouse on the screen and still pass) will pass the test… right? Even the masked areas would be different between the two, wouldn’t it? Or have I misunderstood how the masking process works…? Is the comparison not relative to the position on the screen, or to the window (which in both cases, would be different x,y coordinates)? Even if the image is exactly the same – if you offset it by say 50 pixels either way, unless your tolerances are large enough to account for that 50 pixel drift (in which case, really, so long as there’s SOMETHING on the screen it would pass, right?)
Apologies by the way, for the newbie questions – I’m still quite new to the software, and it’s a LOT more robust and varied, as compared to the previous automation software I had been using. I just want to make sure I’m leveraging the extra capacities here to their fullest.
