Advanced TestComplete SmartBear Academy class!
Hello everyone! We are really excited for ouradvanced TestComplete 301coming up next week! The class isTestComplete 301: Testing Web-Services with TestComplete(8/29@ 2-3pm ET). If you want to join, register athttps://smartbear.com/academy/ Hope to see you there!2.3KViews0likes0CommentsNamemapping check out on edit
How should I work with nameMappingsifour testProject is stored in a source control system (TFS )? My problem: 1. Changing the nameMappings 2. Forgettingto check out nameMappingmanually (test completedoes not offer tocheck out the nameMapping file first); 3. Checking in changes 4. Tests fail on another environment after getting the latest version with my check-in;2.3KViews0likes3CommentsGetRowWithCellText method for Grid
Hi, I am working on an application which has a documents Grid. The grid has more than 10000 rows, we have option to filter but even on filtering the row no of specific row does not change eg, my intended row to work on is at 105 position, if i apply filter and get only 2 visible rows, the row no of intended row still shows as 105. Is there any method in testcomplete which can return us row no of gird using searching specific unique text like we have a method in UFT as GetRowWithCellText("String_Text") ?2.2KViews0likes3CommentsGitActions integration with TestComplete
I would like to see a native integration between TestComplete projects and GitActions runners. Currently the only option is to create a custom workflow and use self-hosted runners, but this on-prem configuration is a bit archaic as many companies are moving to 100% cloud.1.1KViews8likes2CommentsLog Folder Items, Set the Icon while inside the stack (or auto detect on some hiearchy)
I thought this should just be a feature already and I posted asking for help to get it to work. https://community.smartbear.com/t5/TestComplete-General-Discussions/Log-Folder-Icon-Checkpoint-Over-Message-Javascript/m-p/200736#M37434 The log folders are real nice for cleaning up the logs but they only change Icon's if the Folder contains an Error or a Warning. I want LogFolders to show a green if it contains a checkpoint. A common sense order of importance Error > Warning > Checkpoint > Message. Instead it's showing Error > Warning > Message. I think it should even auto detect based on the Log item's priority that has been set. Or just a method to hit ie, Log.CurrentStack(iconWarning, priorityHigh); function TestScriptLog() { Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Error"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Error("Error in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Error"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder"); Log.Error("Error in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Warning"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Warning"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Checkpoint"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Checkpoint"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Informational"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Informational"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); }