Thanks for the utility.
But I see a general trend with TestComplete. Everything is upto the test developers to do or do big coding to get what we want. If that is the case, I can get an open source tool and do all these stuff. I don't have to shell out the money on TestComplete.
When I ask for basic features, the standard reply I get is that this is a different tool. A tool for test automation right ? Not some pure development tool that offers test automation like Visual studio. For example, in this case, it can at least show the basic test name, whether it is the keyword test or the individual function and then we can customize it from code. But if it doesn't offer anything and everything is upto the testers, then the licensing cost is useless.
