NisHera wrote:I have seen this request /suggestion somewhere before. And answer was “There is a Status for each request” unfortunately “ status” doesn’t make any sense to me as an user. And as far as remember, time frame cannot be expose since it’s subject to change and it’s on the hand of TC internal development team.
having said that agree with mgroen2 it's a great product and visibility would make it better.
NisHera thanks for the feedback. Indeed I remember asking for more 'transparancy' regarding feature request (and their follow up plans)...
On the feedback page it's announced that 'We need your help' ..let's just hope all the feedback (feature requests) get rewarded somehow, in the near future...!
Anyone?
Anyone? MKozinets? HKosova? TanyaYatskovska?
Anyone? I just can't believe there is not a single person (besides NisHera), who has anything to mention on this subject? Nobody??
Probably because, for the most part, the tool is very robust, has a lot of options and possibilities, and is easily usable, already, by a wide variety of skill sets. So, generally speaking, a broader road map isn't as high an interest for a lot of people. The primary concerns for most people doing automated testing are whether or not the tool supports the latest development technologies. TestComplete is doing a pretty good job of staying on top of browser versions, they've already released a feature that allows for cross browser testing that is expandable, the various component libraries are frequently being refreshed and updated as they become more widely used, and so on. So, it's really hard to see what kind of "road map" is necessary beyond what is already in the feature requests part of the forum.
