CBleunven
13 years agoContributor
Issue template and reporting under tfs
Hi,
I look to put in place automatic or semi/automatic issue reporting in tfs.
I've based my "study" on this video that was really helpful (I've encountered exactly the same problem about the "connection not found" error message for example).
One of the big limitation I have yet is in the "manual conversion" of a log entry in a tfs Bug according to a template.
I really can not understand why the value for each field is set in the template and not evaluated according to each log ?
Why is the system not able to populate a tfs-Bug field with a TC-log field content ?
It will be so more simple to fill the bugs field filed than having to open the attachment.
I've seen that it's possible to do this when using IssueTracking in a script but this implicate to always use "fully automatic" bug addition that we don't want.
I guess there is already a suggestion for this really important (to my point of view at least) feature. May I participate to the increase of its priority ?
(Additionally, I can suggest that some items are populated not with Log contents but with some project parameters at the running time.)
Anyway, I really enjoy TC that is really flexible and powerful.
Christophe
I look to put in place automatic or semi/automatic issue reporting in tfs.
I've based my "study" on this video that was really helpful (I've encountered exactly the same problem about the "connection not found" error message for example).
One of the big limitation I have yet is in the "manual conversion" of a log entry in a tfs Bug according to a template.
I really can not understand why the value for each field is set in the template and not evaluated according to each log ?
Why is the system not able to populate a tfs-Bug field with a TC-log field content ?
It will be so more simple to fill the bugs field filed than having to open the attachment.
I've seen that it's possible to do this when using IssueTracking in a script but this implicate to always use "fully automatic" bug addition that we don't want.
I guess there is already a suggestion for this really important (to my point of view at least) feature. May I participate to the increase of its priority ?
(Additionally, I can suggest that some items are populated not with Log contents but with some project parameters at the running time.)
Anyway, I really enjoy TC that is really flexible and powerful.
Christophe