Can you reference Keyword tests across Projects in a Project Suite?
Is it possible to reference keyword tests between projects in a project suite? For example, if we had set up our project suite, projects and keyword testsas follows... Project Suite: MyTestSuite Project: FinanceSystemTests Keyword Test:SalesInvoiceCreated Project: WarehouseSystemTests Keyword Test: SalesOrderDespatched ...is it possible to add a Run Keyword Test action in my SalesOrderDespatched keyword test which executes the SalesInvoiceCreated test located in the other project? I've given this a try but the Run Keyword Test popup seems to limit the list to just the current project.Solved709Views0likes1CommentTest runs successfully with "run from selected operation" but fails if it starts beginning
In a keyword test, after clicking a button a popup appears. Popup has a textbox. During the run button has been clicked but textbox hasn't. After "Waiting For LargeText Box Object" message, "Preparing an object recognation hint" message appears for a long time. "Unexpected window" message seen in logs. When I run the test from popup clicking event it goes well, test runs successfully. I couldn't find how to fix it. I add delay before problem steps.Solved935Views0likes2CommentsException while passing object as parameter in keyword test
I am testing an android application and needs to be passed object as parameter in order to call it multiple times.But i am getting an exception while doing that. Attached the screen shot of the keyword test, there are 4 object checkpoints in the test where the value of the object same except NO_ID,NO_ID2,NO_ID3,NO_ID4. So if i pass the complete value text of the object as variable or code expression it is throwing an exception. Any help with this will be highly appreciated. Thanks Nincy1.3KViews0likes1CommentWildcard in Property Checkoint via keyword test
Hi there, is it possible to put a wildcard in a property checkpoint via keyword testing? I.e. I want to test a string with a variable (e.g. time): 12:43PM, lorem ispum So my test would be something like: *+",lorem ipsum" It works in a script, but does it also work in keyword testing? Thanks in advance. ArminSolved1.2KViews0likes2CommentsGenerate Data - not generating random strings but saves a default value
I have a Reference field, where I am entering a random string (min 1 to max 20 chars) andI need this to be unique with a combination of 2 other fields. I've created this variable using Data Generator > String type, using a combinaion of numbers, letters and space. On the 1st test run, it generates a random string. But after this, itsaves this value as the default. So on all my subsequent test runs, instead of generating a new random string, it is using this default value and so it is not a unique reference. I used the 'One value' variable type. Can anyone suggest what I might be doing incorrectly? Thanks!Solved2.6KViews0likes4CommentsJavaFX: Check existence of named label in ListView
Hi everyone, I am building keyword tests for a JavaFX application. On one page of my application I have an overview of items displayed in a ListView. Above the ListView is a check box allowing the user to also view historic entries. If the check box is checked then at the end of the list some additional items appear, the first of which contains a headline in a named lable. If I record a test then the lable might be found like this: Aliases.Item.stage.scene.listViewLogEntryList.listviewitemcell3.lableHeadline My problem now is that the named lable does not always have to be in 'listviewitemcell3'. It could be in any cell with any number. How can I check for the existance of a label with a certain name in a keyword test and somehow turn this into a checkpoint? Ican probably use 'Find Object' to find the label as a child of the ListView could use an 'If ... Then' but that would still not be a check point? Or should I be using some kind of script in this case? Or is there a way to use wildcards in the Alias so that I can eliminate the cell level from the matching process? Best Regards, Axel822Views0likes0Comments