Add a feature in TestExecute tool to run/enable single testcase from Execution Plan.
I had prepare a test plan with mutiple keyword tests on Execution Plan and want to execute only some of them using TestExecute tool but there is only option to run full project using TestExecute tool. So please implement feature to run single test also from TestExecute tool.Execution plan. Enable Disable redesign
Execution plan. Enabled/disabled The most often scenario for us: Run tests with only several items enabled. Items can be in different groups 1. The Context menu is complicated Every time I have to search for the proper option, when I expect it to be in the first, or second position Also often after disabling the part of the playlist I accidentally press 'Enable All' instead of 'Enable selected' and then I have to start from scratch because Ctrl+Z also does not work on this tab Just 'Enable' and 'Disable' menu items will be enough (maybe 'toggle' may stay, someone can use it) BUT enable or disable action should apply for all selected items So 'Enable all' action could be performed by pressing Ctrl+A and then ClickR, 'Enable\Disable|Enable' Same for 'Disable all' 2. Enabling the item does not enable the parent items So you have to click each parent manually. 3. Ctrl+Z should work in case of undo Enbled Disabled
function to get the name of a module started via Run Keyword Test
Please add a function to get the name of a keyword module, started from another keyword module. I need this to quickly identify a failing module in event handler and to quickly navigate in test report. I'm aware of below methods, but all of them return only the name of main module, from which the child module was run (via Run Keyword Module): Project.TestItems.Current.Name - returns name of the main keyword module aqTestCase.CurrentTestCase.Name - returns name of the main keyword module Project.TestItems.Current.ElementToBeRun.Caption - returns "KeywordTests -" + name of the main keyword module For now, I solved the problem by adding Set Variable Value action at start of every keyword module, which sets the project variable with hardcoded module name. But I don't like this solution, because it requires more steps and can cause potential failure in case the module name changes and someone forgets to change the hardcoded string in given module.When change a name in NameMapping, Then the object name in script tests would also update
Let's say you don't like the name you gave an object in the NameMapper. When you change the name of that object, the name will also be updated in any and all Keyword tests which this object was used in. However, the name will Not be updated when used in script tests. It would be nice if the name would be updated in Scripts. Sometimes we think of better naming conventions and want to rename some objects.
Github Copilot Integration
GitHub Copilot suggests code completions as developers type and turns natural language prompts into coding suggestions based on the project's context and style conventions. One new idea would be having a copilot plugin for testcomplete would increase productivity and coding efficiency URL for reference - https://github.com/features/copilot
Possible bug with using regexp for manual object name mapping
I have some desktop application under test where MDI windows have highly variable WndCaption property. This produces an awful lot of name mappings when I record keyword tests. Auto-generated mappings use two parameter-value pairs: "WndClass: Afx:00400000:b*" and "WndCaption: <whatever_caption>". However the captions have some distinctive patterns and naturally I wanted to utilize those patterns to reduce number of mappings. So I created the manual object mappings like this: wndType1: WndClass == "Afx:00400000:b*" WndCaption == "regexp:^Object: .*" wndType2: WndClass == "Afx:00400000:b*" WndCaption == "regexp:^!(Object:).* - \(.*\)$" ... and so on, paying special attention to possible ambiguities when constructing the regular expressions. Mapping worked as expected, showing correct MappedName in the Object Browser. Upon converting the existing keyword tests to use the new mapping, everything functioned seamlessly. However, when I attempted to record new keyword tests, TestComplete consistently generated its own mappings instead of utilizing the existing ones, despite my efforts. After some trial and error, I resorted to replacing the regular expressions with the combination of conditions and wildcards: wndType1: WndClass == "Afx:00400000:b*" WndCaption == "Object: *" wndType2: WndClass == "Afx:00400000:b*" WndCaption == "* - (*)" AND WndCaption != "Object: *" And all of a sudden everything works like a charm! I believe this behavior is not intended, especially since I couldn't find any mention of limitations related to the use of regular expressions in the documentation available.please add method to get CurrentModule name (not just CurrentTestCase name)
Hi, This is a followup to this post: https://community.smartbear.com/t5/TestComplete-Questions/Getting-Name-of-Failed-test-in-OnLogError-Event/td-p/244058 At the moment, we have a property aqTestCase.CurrentTestCase.Name, which returns the name of current Test Case. However, this property returns null/exception in case the module in not set as a 'Test Case' in the Execution Plan. The thing is, that not all modules are usually set as Test Case, therefore aqTestCase.CurrentTestCase.Name is useless for these modules. So it would be nice to have either a new property or extended existing CurrentTestCase.Name property, which will return the name of module, regardless it's set as TestCase or not. Thanks.
Log Folder Items, Set the Icon while inside the stack (or auto detect on some hiearchy)
I thought this should just be a feature already and I posted asking for help to get it to work. https://community.smartbear.com/t5/TestComplete-General-Discussions/Log-Folder-Icon-Checkpoint-Over-Message-Javascript/m-p/200736#M37434 The log folders are real nice for cleaning up the logs but they only change Icon's if the Folder contains an Error or a Warning. I want LogFolders to show a green if it contains a checkpoint. A common sense order of importance Error > Warning > Checkpoint > Message. Instead it's showing Error > Warning > Message. I think it should even auto detect based on the Log item's priority that has been set. Or just a method to hit ie, Log.CurrentStack(iconWarning, priorityHigh); function TestScriptLog() { Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Error"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Error("Error in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Error"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder"); Log.Error("Error in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Warning"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Warning"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Checkpoint"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Checkpoint"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Informational"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Informational"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); }
