Descriptive Programming with Regular Expression

[nimishbhuta]

Hello, 

I have gone through different post related to descriptive programming in TestComplete but not found any appropriate answer to implement this. 

My requirement about Descriptive programming is as follows : 

I am writing custom subroutine for clicking a button on any page as I don't want to use standard method of TestComplete.

    This subroutine will click on the button irrespective of any web application it is not defined for any webpage, 

 For ex : In UFT, I can write Browser("name:=.*").Page("title:=.*").WebButton("name:=.*").Click

From the above example, I can click on any button on any web page, so it is not binded with any application or object repository. 

".*" in the code refer Regular Expression which does not relate to any specific object.

I would like to have similar thing in TestComplete, I am not interested in creating object from the application and then passing to my subroutine. 

Let me know how can it be done with the example. 

Regards,

Nimish

[AlexKaras]

Hi,

The final decision for every case depends on the tested application.

Assuming that the tested application was created with the testability in mind (and this is less than often nowadays), then, usually, the bast approach is a combination of Aliases and .FindXXX(). The peculiarity here is that Aliases must be carefully created in advance, but not automatically during recording. This approach usually provides best balance of code maintainability and performance.

Pure Aliasing usually can be implemented for simple static applications only.

Pure .FindXXX() approach might lack performance and be less visually clear, but, depending on the tested application, it may be the only way of controls' identification, unfortunately.

[tristaanogre]

That's why we run a blend of the two...  A large part of our AUT is static so Mapping the objects ahead of time takes less code and, therefore, less code maintenance. It gives us better performance (less interpretive code to execute and less overhead in the "find" logic) and gives us the added benefit of cached object identities.  However, there are some dynamic portions to our applications so, in those cases, we use the "Find" methods on a parent object that is, itself, mapped... best of both worlds.

[nimishbhuta]

Hello, 

Can you please provide with a sample example using find and conditional mode,so that I get an idea how to implement it?

Regards,

Nimish

[AlexKaras]

Hi,

Conditional mapping: https://support.smartbear.com/testcomplete/docs/testing-with/object-identification/name-mapping/mana...

Finding objects: https://support.smartbear.com/testcomplete/docs/app-objects/common-tasks/searching.html