QAComplete Feature Requests

When someone updates a test case in the library, I want the update to reflect in all active test runs. I know that you can update the test case during a test run but if someone else updates the test case in the library or in their own run, I cannot see those changes.  ... View more

Currently there is no way to track via dashboard reports, tests that have not been run. This is an important use case as it would allow us to track how many tests are still in the queue during a release. You currently have to go in and run a test once to get it to the "awaiting run" status, and that's not worth the time it would take. Just add an "unexecuted" status and have it be triggered if a test set has not been run in it's most recent tagged release/iteration. ... View more

When starting tests from test sets, the only way to view a tests description is to open the print preview.   However since our tests usually have a lot of different preconditions (e.g. which database to use or which steps to prepare) we need the description quite often.   It would be very helpful if a tests description and notes were accessible more quickly in the test runner. ... View more

A key metric I am commonly asked for is "what is our test progress against plan?" Right now, I have a custom field "planned test date" that I have to manually populate test by test (or fast edit). The only way I can report on this is to then run a test library export (from legacy reports as the new reports module .csv includes excessive blank columns) in to an MS Excel dashboard where I then have a formula similar to this: =COUNTIFS('QAC_Extract'![RANGE],[LOOKUP],'QAC_Extract'![RANGE],"<="&[TODAY]) (where LOOKUP is the Planned Test Date) Used in conjunction with total number of tests, and the sum of the tests that have a Last Run Status I can determine how many were planned by today and how many were attempted. This gives me stats as shown in the attachment. It would be great if QAComplete could do all this tracking for me, using a dashboard line chart.   ... View more

Hi,   I think a good addition to the the SOAP API would be the ability to select specific fields when doing a request.   For example, when using the Bugs_LoadByCriteria request we could specified only the field that we want. This will help a lot to reduce the time the query can take and help to have a much clearer response.    Here we would select the Title and the StatusCode <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:prag="http://www.pragmaticsw.com/"> <soapenv:Header/> <soapenv:Body> <prag:Bugs_LoadByCriteria> <!--Optional:--> <prag:AuthenticationData> <!--Optional:--> <prag:AppCode>?</prag:AppCode> <prag:DeptId>?</prag:DeptId> <prag:ProjId>?</prag:ProjId> <prag:UserId>?</prag:UserId> <!--Optional:--> <prag:PassCode>?</prag:PassCode> <!--Optional:--> <prag:ProjIds> <!--Zero or more repetitions:--> <prag:int>?</prag:int> </prag:ProjIds> </prag:AuthenticationData> <!--Optional:--> <prag:Fields> <prag:Field>Title</prag:Field> <prag:Field>StatusCode</prag:Field> </prag:Fields> <!--Optional:--> <prag:Condition>?</prag:Condition> <!--Optional:--> <prag:Sorting>?</prag:Sorting> <prag:PageSize>?</prag:PageSize> <prag:PageNumber>?</prag:PageNumber> </prag:Bugs_LoadByCriteria> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> ... View more

We have thousands of tests in our testing events that must be organized in folders by applications and often sub folders for Day 1, Day 2,Day due to the hospital workflows we test.  Right now all folders must be created manually in QAC.  When we were on HP ALM we were able to build our folder structure into the upload path and ALM would create the folders so we never had to do that manually.  This manual effort can take quite awhile, and in a resource/time constrained environment every minute/hour counts.   Suggestion: Make it possible to define the folder names/structure in the upload *.csv file and enhance tool to create the folders automatically during the upload processing. ... View more

When you copy tests from one project to another in QAC, all related items are copied as well, copying history, notes and attachments from the original items.  We re use test cases frequently and are often asked to copy previously executed test cases over to new projects.  It is inconvenient to go through the new tests and delete all history, notes and attachments.  I believe the alternative is to upload fresh tests every time.  Since we deal with thousands of tests the ability to copy tests from one project to another creating a brand new instance of that test is important.   Suggestion: A Fast Edit option to copy the test, or multiple tests only, without pulling over any history, notes or attachments from the copy source. ... View more

Hi, We currently have a number of teams using our on-prem instance of QAComplete. We have concurrent licenses, however some teams end up using all the licenses, stopping other teams from logging in to work on their projects.   It would be useful if we could set the maximum concurrent logins per project.   Thanks, Brian   ... View more

A way to Clone a Project (Clone+ ?) that includes Releases, Requirements, Test Cases and the Traceability between them. This would support test management for branches in a Sw project. ... View more

I would like to be able to determine, at the requirement level, how many test cases I am planning to have for it.   Example.  I have a requirement that will need 3 test cases. I only write and link one of the 3. The requirement is only 33% covered, as oposed to be considered just "covered" (binary option) when 1 test case is linked.   Regards   Note: This feature is already available in open source tools such as TestLink and it proves very useful. ... View more

Since ALMComplete is at end of life, it would be useful if custom list and shared document capabilities were incorporated into QAComplete.  Our project has recently integrated a help desk capability into QAComplete the last year and have re-purposed the "Agile Tasks" area to accomodate this change.  It would be nice if we could have use the custom list capability for this.  In addition, being able to share test documents would be very helpful. ... View more

In the listing display for the test library and for test sets, a last run status of passed displays in green and a last run status of failed displays in red. It would be helpful if this were more emphatic, such as a green bar and a red bar and possibly a black bar for not run. As it is, it is understated and we really want this to jump out at us. ... View more

To run one test from the Test Library, there is currently a lot of unnecessary clicking. It would be very helpful if unneeded test runner steps were removed when an individual test is being executed rather than a test set. For example, in the Test Library, I click on the Run Now icon, select the release and then have to click the Run Test icon again. As there is only one test, why not display step one after the release is selected?   There is an icon for “Next Test”. As this is not a run of a test set, there is no next test, so that icon should not display.   If I click “Pass All Steps” or “Fail All Steps”, that should be the end of the test. Instead, I click “End Run” and I have to click to pass again.   This may seem minor, but lots of clicking becomes very burdensome when we have many, many tests and not a lot of time. ... View more

We need the ability to add custom fields to the Test Runner.  When we test for a release, new builds are continously created and are used by various departments/individuals to test against.  We need to record which build was used during each test run.  We also need to be able to record which environment the test was executed in.  Our test environments are extremely dynamic in that db schemas are refreshed frequently, new builds are installed, and various browsers are used. This information is needed for each test run for tracking and performing root causes analyses. ... View more

Why can't we have the XXXX naming feature that Requirements have for test cases? If we could also use it as an identifier, we could display the test names in the library tree.  We could see at a glance what tests are in each folder without having to open each folder.  Also wouldn't have to do a quick search just to see where the test is sitting.  All those extra key strokes and waiting for tool response times will really not be missed.  Need this one urgently!   ... View more

The previous version of QA Complete / Automation Bridge would display the total number of tests run and the number of tests passed and tests failed in the run when running a Test Complete project. This functionality seems to have been removed. ... View more

When adding a test library item that is very similar to another, ie. the same but to run on a different host, it would be nice to be able to copy the existing item. ... View more

Strongly recommend on In-corporating the Bulk Update feature with out damaging previous linkage.   we should have this feature available fro Requirements tab and Test management tab   ... View more

Hi there,    I wonder if there is a report i can extract from QA Complete showing information under NOTES tab in each test set ? Our team want so ensure testing analysts respond to our email notification under NOTES within certain time frame, and this report would provide us those information.    Thank you ... View more