QAComplete Feature Requests

I would like to add the Test Case Priority parameter displaying at the Test Runner window. Now, is not displayed and it is not possible to change by application administrator settings.   We need to see it, when we work with test cases at running test set, because we have the different priority test cases in the one test set and when run started, we choose the test cases one by one by their priority, ideally. And we don`t use a way to dispense a test cases by a priority to separate test sets.   Please join this proposal to change. Thanks Jana ... View more

In QAComplete, Is not possible to to do filtering and search in tests imported on a specific test set ( for eg. If we need to search for a particular test case or search by assignee) . ... View more

Many other systems offer a "tags" field that allows end users to quickly categorize our items by related ideas. The closest functionality I can find in QA Complete is a "Choice List (multiselect)" field type, but that does not allow end users to quickly add new items to the list of available options. Instead, it requires an administrator to do so.   I'd like to create (or have built-in) a "Tags" field for my test cases that allows rapid addition of new options, guides the user to quickly find pre-existing values instead of creating near duplicates, and allows API clients to search for test cases that have one or more of the tags assigned. ... View more

For future updates, it might be helpful for users if you add nbr_files attribute to each item in the test_run_results array that results from calling "/api/v2/projects/{ProjectId}/testruns/{Id}/items/". Then it would be possible to call any version of "get list of files" (SOAP or REST) only on items that actually contain files, which would be a good performance enhancement.   See https://community.smartbear.com/t5/QAComplete-and-ALMComplete/Use-API-to-see-if-TestRunResult-has-file-s-attached/m-p/186349#M2333 for a discussion on this and why it would be a valuable addition for developers.   @Nastya_Khovrina  ... View more

I have created an 11.0 report and would like to make it public to the project team. ... View more

Some feature requests for the dashboard: 1) A "Refresh button" for each individual dashboard widget. Sometimes I'm not sure if it's up to date and refreshing the whole page is pretty silly. So maybe a "refresh all widgets" or the ability to refresh and individual widget would be great. 2) Each dashboard widget should indicate how it is being filtered by some kind of header. In the attached image I can't tell that that widget is filtered by a single release that I am targeting (unless there is another widget I should be using?)   Thanks m ... View more

I have a product that requires testing for multiple clients and will use tokenized tests to pass different data (usernames, field names etc). Rather than creating multiple tests that contain the same steps but different token files(1 token file per client) it would be more efficient for me to have the single test set and select which token file to use.   For example, a test that requires all fields on a form to be completed. Client A could have fields 1, 2 and 3 whereas Client B could have fields A, B and C. Each client would have different validation required and/or different character limits. Currently to use the same test I would need to edit the token file and re-upload or make a copy of the test (Which would make it harder keep updated with all the different copies if something changes).    I was thinking this process could work in a similar way to attaching configurations/releases to a Test Set. The token files will be attached to the test set and will be chosen upon running said test set.   If anyone has any methods or work arounds for me, it would be great to hear them.   Thanks. ... View more

The issue I'm facing is in Test Runner in regards to selecting the Test Host for an Automated Test to execute on. I don't set a Default Test Host for my tests because we use a set of different Test Hosts, usually depending on which environment we want to run the tests on or just whichever is available. So when launching a Test or Test Set we simply select the Test Host for each on the Test Runner screen using the < Select Host > drop-down:     This works fine for running single tests, or test sets with only a couple automated tests. But we have some Test Sets with a larger number of tests, and we'd like to have even larger test sets. But it's very tedious to have to select the Test Host for each test in a test set when running the tests. What I'd like is an ability to select the Test Host for all of the Automated Tests in a Test set at the same time.     ... View more

At present user have to Take a screenshot from third party tool, save it locally, then click on upload and find the document where it was saved. It is a process on it own. It would be better if user can take screenshot direclty from QAcomplete tool and don't need to save it locally or just copy and paste direclty in the actual resuts. That will save lot of time.  ... View more

Following features are decreasing the sw useability ever since new visual "upgrade": * Posibility to brows through release tree structure without the need of drop-down (in addition large font makes it impossible to read selected release in the dropdown field) * Interactive icons for "Edit", "Print Friendly", "Email", etc. are shown over the item name and number effectively obstracting it. (It is imposible to demonstrate which defect we are discussing becase when you point on it by mouse, nobody can read the title.)   ... View more

When associating a requirement to a Release (Release A), keep track of the version of the requirement and test cases that relate to this.    If in further releases (Release B) a requirement or a test case changes, the Release B will be associated to the new version of the Requirement and/or Test Case, but Release A will not be affected by that.   Optionally, offer through a dialog if any of the linked (and still active) releases needs to be updated or not to link to the new Req/TC version ... View more

Building a library of automated tests in QA Complete is a time consuming process. The user must do a lot of manual data entry to add each test and a single typo in a file path can stop the test from executing. It would be much simpler if the user could open QA Complete in a browser on a machine that contains their tests then browse to their tests directory and drag and drop them in. ... View more

Hello, I'm using test schedules in order to run automatated tests (TestComplete). I've noticed that I cannot change order of linked Tests/Test Sets. I have to remove them all and add one by one in preferred order. I'd like to request a feature that enables to manage order of linked Tests/Test Sets. In some cases I need to run automated Tests in certain sequence. ... View more

There needs to be support for linking Agile Tasks to Test Sets.  It is much more efficient to create test sets and assign them out and link to them than linking hundreds or thousands of tests to various agile tasks.   ... View more

We would like to export the folder structure of the Test Library.  We have attempted to run various Reports, but only folders that have tests in them are returned, not the entire folder structure. ... View more

We would like to the ability to specify an existing Test within a csv and import new Test Steps for it.  Below is our use case for this request.   For our implementation of QAComplete, we are using a staged rollout.  That is, we are creating Tests without Test Steps and executing the corresponding Test Sets.  We are doing this due to the time constraints and resource limitations to entering the large volume of tests and the varied state of testing documentation throughout the organization.     ... View more

Would be nice to add another checkbox in project set up that allows iterations/builds structure copied to a new project. ... View more

It would be helpful to show the name of the host that tests executed on in the run history window. 2 reasons:   1. While tests are executing it would be good to know which hosts are in use. 2. If tests are failing because of issues with a host then seeing the host name next to failed tests in the run history is a good indicator there is a problem on the host. ... View more