Forum Discussion
Is it just me or does anyone else find the limitation of not being able to run TestComplete with a fixed license on a system with virtualization enabled ridiculous? The licensing page says I can't use a fixed license if running on a VM, but doesn't tell say anything about virtualization simply being enabled. The 'error' message also does not indicate this.
I guess it's just crazy to think a developer or QA tester would have any need to run VMs....
Floating licenses work fine and you can always just keep it to one user.
- pstjohn9 months agoOccasional Contributor
It's also 2x the cost. So you suggest one should pay double to past a silly limitation??
- Marsha_R9 months agoModerator
Silly to you. Azure Devops is silly to me, yet Microsoft does not bend to my standards.
You always have the option of posting a suggestion here
https://community.smartbear.com/category/testcomplete_forum/ideas/testxcompletefeaturerequests
- pstjohn9 months agoOccasional Contributor
Yes, silly to me. The customer. Also,
- Not mentioned on the licensing page,
- Not mentioned in the 'error' dialog you get when attempting to run the product,
- Not mentioned during the sales cycle when the licensing was being decided on,
- A common configuration for practitioners of the trade (which won't work!)
Yep. Silly to me.
Related Content
- 7 years ago
- 2 years ago
Recent Discussions
- 14 hours ago