Forum Discussion
If you have both TestCompelte and TestExecute, then you can leverage Distributed testing to 'control' the test run from TestComplete while it executes on the remote machine using TestExecute.
That's not my scenario. Our development group needs to run a set of regression tests before pushing changes to the repository. I'm not involved in running their tests. The tests are run on from their development machines.
I have solved this by writing small driver scripts that in turn run a subset of our tests. Essentially duplicating the "functionality" provided by test groups (I use scare quotes because if TestExecute can't run test groups, then what's the point?)
- Marsha_R10 years agoChampion Level 3
I think I would set up a separate project for the developers with just the tests they need. Then they just run "Regression Tests" from TestExecute and managing what's in there is separate and doesn't interfere with your testing project. Just use "Add Existing" to put the right groups/tests in their project so they'll be pointing to the original copies of the tests and won't get out of sync.
Related Content
- 6 months agoAvinash12
Recent Discussions
- 5 hours agotramuntana
- 2 days agoSlickRick