Forum Discussion
ronrhe
14 years agoContributor
Hi Louis,
A work around is the same as a bug.
Testcomplete claims to be complete, but it doesn't support a very simple issue like this one.
The solution by David works ok. Putting a ' in the field. But it still is not a nice good way to go. I good live with it to put the text null in these fields, so it's obvious what the meaning is.
To me a test must be as simple as possible to make sure you only find bugs in the application you want to test and not in the test itself.
In some cases scripting can be useful, but i want to use it as little as possible.
The only reason i transform my test to scripts is the huge difference in speed when the executes . Which, i think, also is a bug.
regards
ronald
A work around is the same as a bug.
Testcomplete claims to be complete, but it doesn't support a very simple issue like this one.
The solution by David works ok. Putting a ' in the field. But it still is not a nice good way to go. I good live with it to put the text null in these fields, so it's obvious what the meaning is.
To me a test must be as simple as possible to make sure you only find bugs in the application you want to test and not in the test itself.
In some cases scripting can be useful, but i want to use it as little as possible.
The only reason i transform my test to scripts is the huge difference in speed when the executes . Which, i think, also is a bug.
regards
ronald
Related Content
- 3 years agomrarkapravo
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours agotramuntana
- 2 days agoSlickRick