Forum Discussion
mpegram3rd
15 years agoNew Contributor
Ole,
Thanks... we'll check out the next nightly and give you some feedback on that tomorrow.
Another suggestion though, it might be more ideal to allow the user to just turn off the "request" tracking feature completely via the web.xml. In this particular case we're using the mock service to fake a backend system so we can do load testing against our service consumer which sits in front of it. During load testing we'd never want to track requests. We'd want the mock to be as fast as possible so that we're measuring the performance of our code, not the limitations of the mock. Adding a synchronization block in there is going to hamper the mock's performance.
Again, I appreciate your attention to this particular issue.
Thanks... we'll check out the next nightly and give you some feedback on that tomorrow.
Another suggestion though, it might be more ideal to allow the user to just turn off the "request" tracking feature completely via the web.xml. In this particular case we're using the mock service to fake a backend system so we can do load testing against our service consumer which sits in front of it. During load testing we'd never want to track requests. We'd want the mock to be as fast as possible so that we're measuring the performance of our code, not the limitations of the mock. Adding a synchronization block in there is going to hamper the mock's performance.
Again, I appreciate your attention to this particular issue.