hi,i have mock servis and i would like to set properties from Start Script and OnRequest Script.i know how to work with properties from groovy:// get properties from testCase, testSuite and projectdef testCaseProperty = testRunner.testCase.getPropertyValue( "MyProp" )def testSuiteProperty = testRunner.testCase.testSuite.getPropertyValue( "MyProp" )def projectProperty = testRunner.testCase.testSuite.project.getPropertyValue( "MyProp" )def globalProperty = com.eviware.soapui.SoapUI.globalProperties.getPropertyValue( "MyProp" )// setting values is equally straigh forwardtestRunner.testCase.setPropertyValue( "MyProp", someValue )testRunner.testCase.testSuite.setPropertyValue( "MyProp", someValue )testRunner.testCase.testSuite.project.setPropertyValue( "MyProp", someValue ) com.eviware.soapui.SoapUI.globalProperties.setPropertyValue( "MyProp", someValue ) ...but,what about mock?it's probabley very easy but i just can't find the answer.(global property works in mock just fine, what about the others?)with best regards,beno

Hi!MockService has mockRunner variable available. It can be used to get a hold of project reference, likedef project = mockRunner.getMockService().getProject()and with that we should be able to grab references to test suites/cases and their properties.All options can be seen on http://www.soapui.org/apidocs/com/eviwa ... unner.htmlhttp://www.soapui.org/apidocs/com/eviwa ... rvice.html andhttp://www.soapui.org/apidocs/com/eviwa ... oject.htmlHope this helps!VladimirSmartBear Sweden

...another question...now, i have mock servis with 1 operation - A.when this operation gets activated i have to sent some other request - B, get response from B and copy this response into A (into mock response).is this possible?once again... i get method A on mock service, than i have to send method B (request), get response from B and put this response into A (mock service response) that is still waiting for B to finish. Beno

Hi Beno,sure, the script for your MockResponse can submit the desired request and wait for its response, have a look at the example at http://soapui.org/Service-Mocking/creat ... a-testcase which might give you some ideas..regards!/OleSmartBear Stockholm

ok,i have done this. It's working great for few days now, but... I have very simple moch service with 1 operation - response.During the proces, very simple testCase with 2 operations is started (request and groovy).In mock i can see that most of responses from testCase take 500ms or more (check picture).Groovy in test case has line(s):...def TimeTaken = testRunner.testCase.testSteps["readRecord - Request 1"].testRequest.response.timeTaken...writer.write(today + ", " + id + " - " + TimeTaken + "\r\n");With this line i'm making my own log files and in this file i can see that response from testCase doesn't take that long.2011-09-21 11:37:32, 1593156 - 182011-09-21 11:37:33, 1593157 - 242011-09-21 11:37:33, 1593158 - 42011-09-21 11:37:34, 1593159 - 42011-09-21 11:37:34, 1593160 - 42011-09-21 11:37:35, 1593161 - 62011-09-21 11:37:36, 1593162 - 252011-09-21 11:37:36, 1593163 - 42011-09-21 11:37:37, 1593164 - 42011-09-21 11:37:37, 1593165 - 42011-09-21 11:37:38, 1593166 - 422011-09-21 11:37:39, 1593167 - 42011-09-21 11:37:39, 1593168 - 62011-09-21 11:37:40, 1593169 - 42011-09-21 11:37:40, 1593170 - 62011-09-21 11:37:41, 1593171 - 172011-09-21 11:37:41, 1593172 - 42011-09-21 11:37:42, 1593173 - 62011-09-21 11:37:42, 1593174 - 42011-09-21 11:37:43, 1593175 - 4Why is this difference?"Include request/response in time taken:" from settings doesn't change much.Is "mock" blocking something? Making testCase go slower?This is really important for me to know right now.Tnx,Beno

...another interesting picture.TestCase log is still showing aprox 500ms for each "readRecord - Request 1", almost the same (few ms more) is also in mock log.But!!!If i open "readRecord - Request 1" from testCase, i can see exactly the same results as in my groovy log script.Why are testCase and mock message log showing 100x longer times for "readRecord - Request 1" as they really are?This is making my mock very very slow.Mock can handle just 1 request at the time, right?

Set properties from MOCK | SmartBear Community

SmartBear_Suppo
Alumni
14 years ago
Hi!

MockService has mockRunner variable available. It can be used to get a hold of project reference, like
def project = mockRunner.getMockService().getProject()
and with that we should be able to grab references to test suites/cases and their properties.

All options can be seen on
http://www.soapui.org/apidocs/com/eviwa ... unner.html
http://www.soapui.org/apidocs/com/eviwa ... rvice.html and
http://www.soapui.org/apidocs/com/eviwa ... oject.html

Hope this helps!

Vladimir
SmartBear Sweden
Beno_Iskratel
Frequent Contributor
14 years ago
...another question...

now, i have mock servis with 1 operation - A.

when this operation gets activated i have to sent some other request - B, get response from B and copy this response into A (into mock response).

is this possible?

once again... i get method A on mock service, than i have to send method B (request), get response from B and put this response into A (mock service response) that is still waiting for B to finish.

Beno
SmartBear_Suppo
Alumni
14 years ago
Hi Beno,

sure, the script for your MockResponse can submit the desired request and wait for its response, have a look at the example at http://soapui.org/Service-Mocking/creat ... a-testcase which might give you some ideas..

regards!

/Ole
SmartBear Stockholm
Beno_Iskratel
Frequent Contributor
14 years ago
ok,

i have done this.
It's working great for few days now, but...
I have very simple moch service with 1 operation - response.
During the proces, very simple testCase with 2 operations is started (request and groovy).
In mock i can see that most of responses from testCase take 500ms or more (check picture).

Groovy in test case has line(s):
...
def TimeTaken = testRunner.testCase.testSteps["readRecord - Request 1"].testRequest.response.timeTaken
...
writer.write(today + ", " + id + " - " + TimeTaken + "\r\n");

With this line i'm making my own log files and in this file i can see that response from testCase doesn't take that long.
2011-09-21 11:37:32, 1593156 - 18
2011-09-21 11:37:33, 1593157 - 24
2011-09-21 11:37:33, 1593158 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:34, 1593159 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:34, 1593160 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:35, 1593161 - 6
2011-09-21 11:37:36, 1593162 - 25
2011-09-21 11:37:36, 1593163 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:37, 1593164 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:37, 1593165 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:38, 1593166 - 42
2011-09-21 11:37:39, 1593167 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:39, 1593168 - 6
2011-09-21 11:37:40, 1593169 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:40, 1593170 - 6
2011-09-21 11:37:41, 1593171 - 17
2011-09-21 11:37:41, 1593172 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:42, 1593173 - 6
2011-09-21 11:37:42, 1593174 - 4
2011-09-21 11:37:43, 1593175 - 4

Why is this difference?
"Include request/response in time taken:" from settings doesn't change much.

Is "mock" blocking something? Making testCase go slower?
This is really important for me to know right now.

Tnx,
Beno
Beno_Iskratel
Frequent Contributor
14 years ago
...another interesting picture.
TestCase log is still showing aprox 500ms for each "readRecord - Request 1", almost the same (few ms more) is also in mock log.
But!!!
If i open "readRecord - Request 1" from testCase, i can see exactly the same results as in my groovy log script.

Why are testCase and mock message log showing 100x longer times for "readRecord - Request 1" as they really are?
This is making my mock very very slow.
Mock can handle just 1 request at the time, right?
SmartBear_Suppo
Alumni
14 years ago
Hello,

Can you provide us with project so we can reproduce this behavior and fix if it is a bug. I tried some similar scenario, and I can confirm there are time differences.
But, in test case log it is shown test step execution time, not response time. And in test step execution time you have to take in account other required operations,
like property transfers, for example. Same goes for mock service.

Does this helps,
robert
/SmartBear

Beno_Iskratel

Frequent Contributor

14 years ago

i know.
but, there aren't any other operations, just one groovy that takes 5, perhaps 10ms.
i did solve this in my mock script with:
Thread.startDaemon {
def runner = testCase.run( new com.eviware.soapui.support.types.StringToObjectMap(), false )
}

, but that's not the best solution right now, since manny threads are accessing and revriting the same property in testCase.
by the way, why is there "false" in testCase.run(...)?

here are request for mock and response for testCase.

<S:Envelope xmlns:S="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
   <S:Body>
      <Update_CRMRecord_StatusAS xmlns="http://test57.cocos.si/">
         <pID>2032075</pID>
         <pStatus>Finished</pStatus>
      </Update_CRMRecord_StatusAS>
   </S:Body>
</S:Envelope>

<S:Envelope xmlns:S="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
   <S:Body>
      <ns2:readRecordResponse xmlns="http://ccs.service112.iskratel.si/xsd" xmlns:ns2="http://ccs.service112.iskratel.si">
         <ns2:return>
            <id>1772851</id>
            <crdate>1316609942025</crdate>
            <latitude>4169</latitude>
            <longitude>2714</longitude>
            <operatorid>1</operatorid>
            <phonenumber>8344683104</phonenumber>
            <radious>5768</radious>
         </ns2:return>
      </ns2:readRecordResponse>
   </S:Body>
</S:Envelope>

you'll see that i set proeprty in testCase and then execute testCase.
but, before i execute testCase some other thread can replace property and scenario is not perfect anymore(because of Thread.startDaemon).
is there any way to awoid this?

i also do get a lot of this now:
soapUI log:

Thu Sep 22 08:00:20 CEST 2011:ERROR:An error occured [java.lang.NullPointerException], see error log for details
Thu Sep 22 08:00:20 CEST 2011:ERROR:Exception during Test Execution
   java.lang.NullPointerException
    at com.eviware.soapui.report.JUnitReportCollector.afterStep(JUnitReportCollector.java:168)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestCaseRunner.runTestStep(AbstractTestCaseRunner.java:244)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.testcase.WsdlTestCaseRunner.runCurrentTestStep(WsdlTestCaseRunner.java:48)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestCaseRunner.internalRun(AbstractTestCaseRunner.java:141)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestCaseRunner.internalRun(AbstractTestCaseRunner.java:42)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestRunner.run(AbstractTestRunner.java:135)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestRunner.start(AbstractTestRunner.java:77)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.testcase.WsdlTestCase.run(WsdlTestCase.java:631)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.testcase.WsdlTestCase.run(WsdlTestCase.java:71)
    at com.eviware.soapui.model.testsuite.TestCase$run.call(Unknown Source)
    at Script1$_run_closure1.doCall(Script1.groovy:26)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor68.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:90)
    at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:233)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.metaclass.ClosureMetaClass.invokeMethod(ClosureMetaClass.java:272)
    at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:885)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoMetaClassSite.callCurrent(PogoMetaClassSite.java:66)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:141)
    at Script1$_run_closure1.doCall(Script1.groovy)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor67.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:90)
    at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:233)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.metaclass.ClosureMetaClass.invokeMethod(ClosureMetaClass.java:272)
    at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:885)
    at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:405)
    at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:399)
    at groovy.lang.Closure.run(Closure.java:483)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

errorLog:

Thu Sep 22 08:00:20 CEST 2011:ERROR:java.lang.NullPointerException
   java.lang.NullPointerException
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.GetEffectivePojoPropertySite.acceptGetProperty(GetEffectivePojoPropertySite.java:51)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:227)
    at Script1.run(Script1.groovy:2)
    at com.eviware.soapui.support.scripting.groovy.SoapUIGroovyScriptEngine.run(SoapUIGroovyScriptEngine.java:96)
    at com.eviware.soapui.support.scripting.groovy.SoapUIProGroovyScriptEngineFactory$SoapUIProGroovyScriptEngine.run(SourceFile:88)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.teststeps.WsdlGroovyScriptTestStep.run(WsdlGroovyScriptTestStep.java:148)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestCaseRunner.runTestStep(AbstractTestCaseRunner.java:232)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.testcase.WsdlTestCaseRunner.runCurrentTestStep(WsdlTestCaseRunner.java:48)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestCaseRunner.internalRun(AbstractTestCaseRunner.java:141)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestCaseRunner.internalRun(AbstractTestCaseRunner.java:42)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestRunner.run(AbstractTestRunner.java:135)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.support.AbstractTestRunner.start(AbstractTestRunner.java:77)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.testcase.WsdlTestCase.run(WsdlTestCase.java:631)
    at com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.testcase.WsdlTestCase.run(WsdlTestCase.java:71)
    at com.eviware.soapui.model.testsuite.TestCase$run.call(Unknown Source)
    at Script1$_run_closure1.doCall(Script1.groovy:26)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor68.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:90)
    at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:233)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.metaclass.ClosureMetaClass.invokeMethod(ClosureMetaClass.java:272)
    at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:885)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoMetaClassSite.callCurrent(PogoMetaClassSite.java:66)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:141)
    at Script1$_run_closure1.doCall(Script1.groovy)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor67.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:90)
    at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:233)
    at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.metaclass.ClosureMetaClass.invokeMethod(ClosureMetaClass.java:272)
    at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:885)
    at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:405)
    at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:399)
    at groovy.lang.Closure.run(Closure.java:483)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

it has to do something with Thread.startDaemon but i don't know what. probably because multiple threads access same property and same testCase at the same time.

any ide how to improve test scenario would be welcome.

with best regards,
beno

COCOS-sim-soapui-project.xml133 KB

SmartBear_Suppo
Alumni
14 years ago
Hi,

back to the original problem - there is an overhead of starting the testcase internally, calling all handlers, etc.. so I don't see the times you get as very odd. But you are on to something; Mock Responses are dispatched in parallell so you might have several threads executing the TestCase at the same time, which will probably cause errors in some situations.

Another option could be to just submit a standalone request from your script (instead of running a TestCase), try the following to do this:

def request = project.interfaces["..."].operations["..."].getRequestByName( "..." )
request.submit( new com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.WsdlSubmitContext( request ), false )
log request.response.contentAsString

This should also require a lower overhead and will work with multiple threads executing in parallell..

Does that help?

regards,

/Ole
SmartBear Software
Beno_Iskratel
Frequent Contributor
14 years ago
This is amazing!

def project = mockResponse.mockOperation.mockService.project //doesn't work without this
def request = project.interfaces["..."].operations["..."].getRequestByName( "..." )
request.submit( new com.eviware.soapui.impl.wsdl.WsdlSubmitContext( request ), false )
log.info request.response.contentAsString

can someone please just tell me how to modify request? (request directly in interface, not testCase or something like this)

i would like to change id dynamically from this groovy (mock response script).

<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:ccs="http://ccs.service112.iskratel.si">
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<ccs:readRecord>
<ccs:id>2359175</ccs:id>
</ccs:readRecord>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

there will still be one object accessed at the same time by multiple threads, right?
so, not perfect, but still, good improvement.

tnx.
SmartBear_Suppo
Alumni
14 years ago
Hi,

yes.. if you modify the request it will affect all threads using it. You can modify the request content with

request.requestContent = ...

Hope this helps,

regards,

/Ole
SmartBear Software

Forum Discussion

Set properties from MOCK

Recent Discussions

Windows installation <user>

Automation for SignalingService

Unable to see receive MQTT message in response

Related Content

Problem with properties validation on mock server

Get property from test case in mock script assertion(SOAP)

How to use a project property in mock service resource path