13 years ago
Mercurial Best Practices?
I'm looking to establish an automated code review process for our team. Currently we are about 20 developers who use Mercurial and upload diffs to CodeCollaborator by hand.
Ideally I'd like an *automated* process that ensures changesets have been reviewed prior to a push to our master repo.
The closest I've seen is this solution:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/48272/recommended-process-for-code-reviews-with-mercurial
This solution looks promising but it requires custom scripting and a separately managed database.
Is there a more efficient way to enforce code reviews using Mercurial and CodeCollaborator??
Ideally I'd like an *automated* process that ensures changesets have been reviewed prior to a push to our master repo.
The closest I've seen is this solution:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/48272/recommended-process-for-code-reviews-with-mercurial
This solution looks promising but it requires custom scripting and a separately managed database.
Is there a more efficient way to enforce code reviews using Mercurial and CodeCollaborator??