Forum Discussion
tbcooper
14 years agoNew Contributor
The main difference between using addchanges and addcvsdiffs is the amount of metadata you get. When using addchanges, we connect to the CVS server, and, as a result, are able to get more meta data. While using addcvsdiffs, you get less metadata because we do not contact the CVS server.
You are correct that using addchanges will catch the hostname of the
machine from which the changes are uploaded. For Perforce and
Subversion, we have server integration that will allow you to map the machines so that they show as part of the same repository, and that eliminates the issue you are
seeing. (For more information on the mapping with Perforce and
Subversion, see Client Configuration Mapping at
http://codecollaborator.smartbear.com/docs/manual/6.0/index.html?admin_version_control.html.)
With CVS, however, we have no way of pulling out the machine names and thus are unable to map them to one CVS server. A suggested workaround is to use addcvsdiffs exclusively.
You are correct that using addchanges will catch the hostname of the
machine from which the changes are uploaded. For Perforce and
Subversion, we have server integration that will allow you to map the machines so that they show as part of the same repository, and that eliminates the issue you are
seeing. (For more information on the mapping with Perforce and
Subversion, see Client Configuration Mapping at
http://codecollaborator.smartbear.com/docs/manual/6.0/index.html?admin_version_control.html.)
With CVS, however, we have no way of pulling out the machine names and thus are unable to map them to one CVS server. A suggested workaround is to use addcvsdiffs exclusively.
Related Content
- 5 years ago
- 7 years ago
Recent Discussions
- 3 months ago