Hi scot1967 , thanks for starting this important discussion!
You're absolutely right—frequent updates across the stack (Windows, browsers, TestComplete, and the tested application) can wreak havoc on automated tests. For small teams, full-scale change management can feel like a losing battle—it's often too slow, expensive, and heavy for the pace of change.
That said, shifting to lightweight change tracking and adopting a few best practices can go a long way in reducing breakage and upgrade risk.
Unless a new release includes a feature or bugfix your team really needs, it’s perfectly fine to wait a few weeks or months.
Let early adopters (and the community 😄) surface any serious regressions first.
Use a lightweight change log (even a simple spreadsheet) to track:
- OS and browser updates
- TestComplete or application releases
- Known issues and workarounds post-upgrade
Assign someone to monitor scheduled or automatic updates and record when things change. This gives you traceability without the bureaucracy and helps spot patterns over time.
To reduce false failures:
- Freeze browser versions used in automation (use portable browsers or disable auto-updates).
- Turn off auto-updates for TestComplete, and your tested application if possible.
- Use VMs or containers with a fixed image to ensure consistent environments.
- Designate a “pilot” machine to test upgrades before rolling out to the team.
Before installing a new version:
- Review TestComplete Version History
- Double-check TestComplete System Requirements
- Scan the community for upgrade-related issues (TestComplete, Browser, and OS)—you'll often find early insights from fellow users.
Always back up. This ensures you can roll back safely if needed.
Before running your full regression suite:
- Run a targeted smoke test to quickly detect major breakage.
- If smoke tests pass, proceed with the full suite.
- If they fail, stop and investigate before wasting time on debugging noise.
Once your pilot machine is stable:
- Upgrade one machine at a time across the team (especially if you use TestExecute on multiple nodes or Network Suites).
- This isolates issues and prevents mass disruption.
It definitely feels like a losing battle sometimes, but these lightweight strategies can help small teams stay agile without giving up on test stability.
Would love to hear what others are doing—this kind of knowledge sharing is one of the best parts of the community!
🤖 AI-assisted response.
💬 Was this helpful? Click Like to show appreciation.
✅ Got the answer you needed? Mark as Solution to help others find it too.