Contributions
Re: QAComplete 10.2 Rest API Authorization
Follow the below steps to setup the script in Postman and you should be able to create adefect using the API's Step 1 URI - https://qacomplete.smartbear.com/rest-api/service/api/v1/projects/{ProjectId}/defects Replace project id. You can find the project Id in the QAComplete URL Step 2 - Authorization Tab Authorization Select Type - Basic Auth Enter your QAComplete - Username & Password Step 3 - Header Tab Key - Content-Type Value - application/json Step 4 - Body Tab Select option raw (Radio button) Set the Request Payload in the Body tab { "Title": "SAMPLE TITLE 1", "Status": "In Progress", "Description": "Test Desc" } Step 5 Save and click on Send button, Defects will be created in QAComplete.4KViews1like2CommentsRe: QAComplete 10.2 Rest API Authorization
1. Create a newPOST operation. 2. Authorization type should be Basic auth. Provide the User Id and password. 3. Parameterize the Environment Variables in the Endpoints if required, Example {{url}}/api/v2/projects/{{projectid}}/Tests/Folders. Go to Postman Runner and point to your test case sheet from where the data needs to be extracted. Try with couple of scenarios and you can see more options after this.4KViews0likes6CommentsRe: Custom Field Values and assigning existing defects at the time of execution
Go the update from QAComplete that we cannot assign existing defect to the test cases at the time ofRunning them in QAComplete. Alternate is to save the defectinformation in a custom field. Not able to generate reports for defects mentioned in the custom field. This is a QAComplete limitation currently.1.3KViews0likes0CommentsCustom Field Values and assigning existing defects at the time of execution
Hi All, Can we perform the below two activities in the latest QAComplete SAAS version 1. Assigning existing defects to the test cases at the time of execution in Test sets. 2. Can we generatedashboard or reports based on the custom fields values Regards, Vikas1.5KViews0likes1CommentQAComplete Limitations or improvements to be addressed
We have recently purchased the tool and noticed the below limitations / improvements . Feature to assign a TAG / labelsneeds to be added. Assign existing defects to Test cases at the time of execution. Changes made to the test cases in Test sets at the time of executionare no local and are will be reflected in the original test cases. This is defeating the feature of Fast Edit the tool offers. Performance is very slow when trying to load Test sets instances having only 20 test cases. JIRA Integration - Mapping needs to be done on a field level and status level. Field level validations are not working as expected for Custom Fields. For a Text field if length 200 characters when we enter 150 characters the front end validation is telling that there are more than 20 characters in the field. UI / Performance for Test management features needs to be improved. If anyone in the group has found a solution or a work around this can you please get back to us.1.1KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Linking and Existing defect during Test Execution from Test set itself
I am surprised QAComplete has not implemented this feature yet. This is would be a big turn off for testers who would like to move to QAComplete. This saves a lot of manual effo vpakawrote: It would be a really good feature to have an abiltiy to link an existing active defect that causing the test to fail during the Test Execution from the Test Set. Currently all we can see is "Auto Create Defect" window. This would be really helpful in failing test case and continue to excute the restof the test cases from test set by simply adding an existing defect to it vpakawrote: It would be a really good feature to have an abiltiy to link an existing active defect that causing the test to fail during the Test Execution from the Test Set. Currently all we can see is "Auto Create Defect" window. This would be really helpful in failing test case and continue to excute the restof the test cases from test set by simply adding an existing defect to it rt1.8KViews0likes0Comments