DAustermeier
Occasional Contributor
Joined 8 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
Contributions
Re: how to continue to next Data-Driven loop item on error
Thanks for your answer. On the one hand I understand now why it didn't work the way I tried to do it, but on the other hand I still can't make it work. I think I understood the concept of what your're trying to explain, but I don't really know how to throw/raise the error. Would it be possible to use an OnLogError-EventHandler in order to raise the python exception? Could I catch such an exception with the script I posted above? Regards, David3.8KViews0likes1CommentRe: how to continue to next Data-Driven loop item on error
Hi there, I'm trying the same thing as Hardy but my script won't continue with the next loop item. I tried it with the "stop on error" setting enabled or disabled, but in both cases my script doesn't execute the keyword test I'd like to run in the except. I'd appreciate any help Regards, David My script: def VA_Test(): Project.Variables.VA_Test_Parameter.Reset() while not Project.Variables.VA_Test_Parameter.IsEOF(): try: KeywordTests.Login.Run() KeywordTests.MMS100_VerteilauftragErstellen.Run() Delay(40000, "wait") KeywordTests.MMS100_VARuestrueckmeldung.Run() KeywordTests.MMS100_VA_RuestenKorrigieren.Run() KeywordTests.Logoff.Run() except: KeywordTests.CleanUp.Run() finally: Project.Variables.VA_Test_Parameter.Next()3.8KViews0likes3CommentsUse wildcards in If...Then statement
Hi there, I want to do check if an object property is beginning with "0 MIL". If it does I'd like to do some operations and if it doesn't I'd like to do sth. else. Therefore I tried to use a wildcard (*) in the If...Then statement. My Keyword test compares an object property as Value 1 (e.g. "0 MIL, 10 PCE") with a constant String as Value 2 (0 MIL*). The expected result of my example would be that Testcomplete executes everything assingned to the If...Then statement, but the test never enters the If...Then part. What am I doing wrong? or is there another way to handle this issue? Regards, DavidSolved2.2KViews0likes3CommentsObject checkpiont needs a different amount of time from test run to test run
Hello everyone, I'm trying to create a very small performance test for our erp-system using Testcomplete. My testcase contains: - logging in - start of the stopwatch - opening a programm in the tested application - object checkpoint - end of the stopwatch Assuming that the object checkpoint would need some time to find the object on my screen I created a second test to find out how long this would be: - start of the stopwatch - object checkpoint - end of the stopwatch When I run this test with the object already on screen I get results which are quite confusing to me: executing this test the first time the Stopwatch takes about 1500 ms and for another test run it only needs 1200 ms. The problem I have with this is following: I can't really measure the time a programm of the tested application needs to load, because the time checkpiont needs is different from test run to test run. Is there any possibility to avoid this problem with Testcomplete? Thanks in advance, David970Views0likes2Comments