stevep
New Contributor
Joined 8 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
Contributions
Re: Moving the indicator object
I would like to be able to move the indicator (maybe only when the script is paused?). Because our application has the waiting for data indicator directly under the script status indicator. This makes it hard when monitoring the tests to see if my delays are set correctly (i.e. am I waiting too long or not log enough).8.8KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Allow test items that are in a group to fail the group.
I agree that this would need to be configurable just like you have the ability the say if a test item fails stop the project or just stop the test item. groups should have the ability on failure to stop the project or stop the group. In my cast I have 10 groups each group represents a test "scenario", inside of each group is around 20-25 test items, These test items can have over 100 steps. If I were to combine all the test items into 1, analyzing the log would be a nightmare for our QA people. The current way I get around this issue is to make each scenario a project, then run the suite. This works ok except that make reusing some of the code harder.10KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Skip to next group on error.
That defeats the whole purpose of having groups. With your approach the resulting report show only 2 tests were run, when in fact many tests were run, management won't like that. By using 1 big test makes it difficult to track where something wen wrong because you have to look through very long lists of test steps. This also makes it very difficult to log an accurate defect in QA complete because the test cases won't match the tests. I guess the only other way of doing it is to turn my groups into projects then run the suite. Any other suggestions? Thanks for your help.1KViews0likes0CommentsSkip to next group on error.
I have tests that are dependent on each other. I have these tests items grouped together in an item group. I can't figure out how to set it up so that when one item in the group fails test complete ignores the rest of the test and starts executing the next group. If someone has an example on how to do that I would appreciate the help.1.1KViews0likes2CommentsRe: Support references to NameMappings of other projects
I would like to add a +1 from me as well. I have a different use case. I need to access a 3rd party web site to submit data to my site and receive data from my site. Our QA people want that round trip of data in 1 unit. If I could have 2 name mapping files I could separate the name map of the third party site from my site. This would help with maintenance, and speed since both sites have very large maps.11KViews0likes0Comments