rndasa
Occasional Contributor
Joined 9 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
Contributions
TEST COMPLETE chrome Extension compatibility with chrome 64 and above
My current functional testing framework developed on TC12.31, but it is not working on Chrome 64 or higher because of of its Extension. 1) Is there any work around for TC chrome extension enabling in Chrome 66? 2) Can we put this Chrome extension in Google web store? 3) Why smart bear is not uploading their extensions into Google web store?694Views0likes1CommentRe: HOW DO I PASS AFUNCTION NAME AS A DATA PARAMETER FROM SPREADSHEET AND IS THERE A WAY TOCALL DAT METH
I tried, and facing below issues..any help will be appreciated: https://community.smartbear.com/t5/TestComplete-Functional-Web/Runner-CallMethod-not-working-when-passing-function-name-as/m-p/156134#M314451.3KViews0likes1CommentRe: Runner.CallMethod not working when passing function name as param from spreadsheet
I tried with /without braces, But always giving "function expected" error/reference error. And I did "eval "as well. var ResultParam = eval(Runner.CallMethod(_impl_verificationManager(),tcInfo,tcData)); Here is my requirement: I have two arrays.In array1 contain functionNames as well.Array2 contains soma required parameters. I am trying to passing these two arrays as parameters into a function. Which has to call on-demand array[x](Array2) where xth element is function name. Iam trying couple of models , some of them are not able to call,some of them are not able to return values into resultparam.2.1KViews0likes2CommentsRe: Runner.CallMethod not working when passing function name as param from spreadsheet
ACTUAL CALLING ROUTINE: function tester(){ tcInfo =[0,0,"TC333_VERIFY","TC_EXPT","TC_ACTUAL","NULL"] tcData =[0,0,"TC333","ABC"] verificationManager(tcInfo,tcData) } IMPLEMENTATION CLASSES function verificationManager(tcInfo,tcData) { try { var ResultParam = Runner.CallMethod(_impl_verificationManager,tcInfo,tcData); } catch (e) { Log.Error("Error occured while executing 'verificationManager' and error description is:" + e.description); } finally { Log.Message(ResultParam+"--------------"+ tcInfo[3]+"--------------"+ tcInfo[4]+"--------------"+ tcInfo[5]); } } function _impl_verificationManager(tcInfo,tcData ){ var C = eval(tcInfo[3]+ "(" + tcData + ")" ) return C } function TC333_VERIFY(K){ Log.Message(K) return 1 }2.1KViews0likes1Commentis there any way to extract log reports
Is there any framework or any functionality is there to export Log file into a required report format? I am looking for a test summary report in either FE level or User story level or Test case level instead of whole MHT file. I developed a Data-driven framework, but i am not able to upload my log into user desired model using test complete.858Views0likes1CommentRe: clicking action taking long time in testComplete11.2
First:I checked with my dev team and there is no development on this specific gadget . Second: I am able to see working fine while performing Manually Third:In the above logic..Only else part is having click operation, and entire loop is not consuming much time except "else" part. Fourth: After click...is there any process to see what threads are in process for TESTCOMPLETE? Fifth: Is testcomplete is compatible with CHROME52?? Sixth:Is there any debugging mechanism to see what system performing while doing that (76 sec) time? like any server/test complete process monitor logs? or any extension for analytics?? Finally..Problem is not resolved and still that code snippet is still irritating.2.9KViews0likes1CommentRe: clicking action taking long time in testComplete11.2
Kool..Thanks for quick reply... Here is the things listed... 1) Manual operations on application resulting page load within .5 to 1 sec. 2) If you observe my log snapshot...Name mapping or object identification is not as issue...why because almost other 25 objects identified and validated in 2 to 3 sec duration. 3)I am able to see the delay after "Identifying obj"(highlight or hover or cursor moves to selected check box) and click. 4)I didn't use any event handlers in this proj...(Planning to implement in future). 5) within these couple weeks, there may be new development happened to add some new features in overall application, but it is not related to current code,then why this one effected? Code is executing correctly.... 6) Checkbox is identified by "find child "mechanism..offcourse all +ve checked boxes also identified by same loop.2.9KViews0likes3Comments