Contributions
Re: How to identify mapped objects when testing web page in NameMapping?
Thanks for reply. I am adding a screen shot of web page. It is very simple. Results depend on what was entered in other system. But there can be diferent types and the same screen can be reached by different ways. Please take a look may be you will suggest something from your experience how it is better to test it. I have tried to uncheck "Extended Find" for such components. I tried with few ones and seems to be working.2.7KViews0likes2CommentsRe: How to identify mapped objects when testing web page in NameMapping?
Content text differs only in this case. It is not an option because I have some components with the same content text but different calss or path or smth else. When there are a lot of such components they are not find by executing tests. Regarding ID I am not sure from where it comes as there is no ID in web code. Is it specific ID generated by TestComplete. Can it be unique for each created component? To use FindChildByXPath method I need to create all test case as script. Am I correct? Because at the moment I recorded test case using "Record Keyword Test".2.8KViews0likes1CommentRe: How to identify mapped objects when testing web page in NameMapping?
Thanks for replies. I have attached screenshot of properties of two different components which are reached in different ways. A lot of components have the similar properties. I have tried to combine by path, class, name, text but some of them are the same for components which are reashed in different ways. From my understanding the help would be if TestComplete properties also would show Xpath. In my case every component would be identified. E.g. The first component has Xpath: /html/body/div[20]/div[3]/ul/li[2] The second component has Xpath: /html/body/div[34]/div[2]/ul/li[1] Is any other solution for this case?2.8KViews0likes1CommentHow to identify mapped objects when testing web page in NameMapping?
How to identify mapped objects when testing web page in NameMapping? The problem is that for several units the same path or class is used. So combined properties do not work. If I use full path name then it takes also version what is not correct for my test cases as it won't work on newer version testing. Is it possible to create some identification by my self for each tested unit in NameMapping? Or is there any other solution?Solved2.8KViews0likes9Comments