ContributionsMost RecentMost LikesSolutionsScript access to custom web grids using InnerHTML property Hi, I'm trying to perform grid actions on a web application with custom grids that TestComplete does not identify as objects. The closest access using the Object Spy is to a parent panel that contains the grid. This panel includes all the grid objects within the HTML that I can access via the panel's InnerHTML property. I'm used to writing VBScript tests for .Net applications so I'm somewhat puzzled as to how to script access to InnerHTML so that I can perform typical grid actions. Is there a way to do this natively via script or perhaps a way to get TestComplete to identify the html grid tags as objects in their own right? Thanks in advance for any assistance! Re: Need your vote on the new SmartBear Test Product name! Test InCode would be my preferred option. The other names remind me of other products whereas Test InCode is unique and descriptive. Using the Namemapping repo when recording keyword tests Hi, When we record keyword tests, objects are identified using their full object path. Is it possible to use the aliases from the namemapping repoisitory during the recording a keyword test? We have the option to "Map Object Names Automatically" disabled because we need control over what and how objects are added. Thanks. Difference between using Sys.Keys or TestObj.Keys Hi, I've inherited a test project that uses both Sys.Keys and TestObj.Keys methods to simulate keystrokes. For example: Some units contain Call Sys.Keys("[F10]") While others contain Call frmMenu.StripMainMenu.Keys("[F10]") Are there any benefits over using object specific key presses over Sys.Keys? I suspect that using Sys.Keys makes it easier to maintain tests if object names change but I'd like to know whether there are best practises to follow. Thanks, Dan Solved