gnivlag
Occasional Contributor
Joined 14 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
Contributions
Script code to obtain Table store column header
I have a Table store in my project and wanted to obtain the column header but cannot seem to find a way to do that. I am able to use Tables.MyTableStore.Values(4, 2) to obtain the value stored in row 4 column 2 of MyTableStore, but I do not see a mechanism for obtaining the actual column header(s) from script code. Perhaps I am over looking this.3.5KViews0likes1CommentRe: Table Checkpoint that uses a spreadsheet as a store
Thank you for your reply. Is there an existing feature request for this such that an Excel spreadsheet can be referenced as a checkpoint and modified such that TestComplete is not needed for modifying or updating the Excel spreadsheet?1.1KViews0likes0CommentsTable Checkpoint that uses a spreadsheet as a store
I currently have a test that uses a Table Checkpoint that verifies the contents of a DevExpress data grid. By default, the Table Checkpoint uses a Table Store that stores the expected contents of the DevExpress grid. What I've noticed is that over time I've been needing to frequently modify the Table Store within TestComplete which is not as easy as modifying the stored data directly in a spreadsheet (CSV or Excel). Is there an easy way that I can use a spreadsheet as a store instead of having to rely upon TestComplete's Table Store mechanism?4.8KViews0likes3CommentsInconsistent name mappings
I am using TestComplete 9.30 and when running my scripts I am getting inconsistent name mappings for my .NET windows form application. Sometimes my main application form is recognized in the Object Explorer as Window("WindowsForms10.Window.8.app.0.34f5582_r11_ad1", "", 3) and other times it is recognized as WinFormsObject("MainApplicationFormBase"). I was able to get around some of my issues using name mapping wildcards, but when my application recognizes as "WindowsForms10.Window.8.app.0.34f5582_r11_ad1", my script cannot find the MainMenu object for selecting menu items. I combed the forums and saw similar inquiries with a possible solution being increase the "Method invoke timeout" to 20000, but this did not help.3.9KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Does SmartBear offer a standalone object spy and browser separate from TC?
I would also love to see a standalone object browser tool to help when executing scripts using TestExecute on a clean environment that does not have TestComplete installed. Can you please increase the rating for this feature as well for me?2.2KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Testcomplete 9: Extremely slow test execution
Alex, Even after upgrading to 9.0.1312, I am still experiencing test execution slowness. I have submitted information as requested above (Issue M0102218), but still need instructions on where to upload larger files. I also forgot to mark the issue as "Urgent", so can you change that for me?1.8KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Testcomplete 9: Extremely slow test execution
Bump. Test execution using TestExecute went from around 50 minutes to 2-2.5 hours when upgrading from 8.60 to 9.0. I already upgraded my project already to 9.0 and have made other changes already, so it looks like I can't even go back to 8.x without significant efforts. Since I see so many people experiencing similar behavior, is SmartBear aware of an issue regarding test execution slowness?3.3KViews0likes0CommentsUpgrading from 8.50 to 8.60
I was interested in upgrading my installation of TestComplete Enterprise (floating license) from 8.50 to 8.60. Before I went ahead and did this, I wanted to know will I need to purchase an upgrade? Also, will I need to also upgrade my installation of the license manager as well? Thanks in advance.18KViews0likes1Comment