ContributionsMost RecentMost LikesSolutionsRe: List and ComboBox handled differently?All set. The solution was to add a waitchild statement into the exists statement so: oResult = viewer.WaitChild("List(0)", 300).Exists; List and ComboBox handled differently?I have two functions: 1) function CloseActionHistory() { var strModuleID = c_strModule + CFGeneralUtilities.GetFunctionName(arguments.callee); var viewer = Aliases.iexplore.pageViewer.panelViewerDocumentswf.objectViewerswf; viewer.buttonHideActionHistory.Click(); //Hide the Action history Sys.Refresh(); //Refresh the Object browser oResult = !viewer.ComboBox(0).Exists; CheckResult(oResult, "Action History did not close"); if(!oResult) { Log.Message("Action History closed upon click of Hide Action History button"); } } 2) function HideThumbnails() { var strModuleID = c_strModule + CFGeneralUtilities.GetFunctionName(arguments.callee); var viewer = Aliases.iexplore.pageViewer.panelViewerDocumentswf.objectViewerswf; viewer.buttonHideThumbnails.Click(); //Hide the Action history Sys.Refresh(); //Refresh the Object browser oResult = !viewer.List(0).Exists; CheckResult(oResult, "Thumbnails widget did not close"); if(!oResult) { Log.Message("Thumbnails widget closed upon click of Hide Thumbnails button"); } } As you notice the only difference(other then the item names) is that the first oResult call in each funtion refers to 1) a ComboBox and 2) a List. The second function throws an error that it was "Unable to find the object List(0).". Why are these exists calls treated differently? Unit testing via scripts?Is there a way to execute junit unit tests via scripts? Specifically, I'd like to write a script that scans a specific directory for Junit test scripts that have been created, and then runs them as unit tests? Is there any way to do that without adding them manually via the Unit Test dialog? Working With XML Files From ScriptsI've followed the instructions to the letter on the help page titled "Working With XML Files From Scripts" I've created the exact same data.xml and placed it in my root directory. I've cut and paste the exact function into my project. However, on the line "Doc = Sys.OleObject("Msxml2.DOMDocument.4.0"); I get an error "An exception occurred in the "filename" unit at line 132: Invalid Class string: cannot obtain ClassID" Can you help clarify the issue? Re: not able to find firefox all of a sudden?Allen, It worked fine before. The fact that I can't find firefox now causes my tests to fail to run. I can't highlight anything else that is beneath the firefox name mapping tree anymore either. not able to find firefox all of a sudden?As you can see from the attached screenshot, firefox is open. The process name is firefox, and firefox is mapped via name mapping to Sys.Process("firefox"). However as of this morning, I am unable to "find" firefox when I try to highlight it on screen(or reference it via my automation). Please advise. --L Re: Unable to find objectDavid it is an internal website. Perhaps a webex or some other option? Re: Unable to find objectI was able to fix it using your steps however a new issue has presented itself: Prereqs: I clear the cache as part of the automated test in case it matters. There is a PageFooter panel which contains some information on the page I am testing. The page loads fine(and the panel is obviously there). However, the Object Browser does not see this PageFooter panel when I refresh the object browser(after the test fails because it couldn't find the footer). If I refresh the webpage, object browser now sees the page footer. Might be best to split this off so I don't steal Damian's post(sorry) Re: Unable to find objectOS: Win XP Browser: Firefox Script Language: JScript I am having (or I think so) a similar issue. A grid item from a login dialog (which is already on the screen) is not found, I get a "waiting for grid" item at the top right corner of TC. The dialog is on the screen, and when after test failure, I go to the NameMapping screen and ask it to highlight the grid item on the screen, it does so without any problems. Can you provide guidance? The strangest thing of all, is that this exact same test worked FINE yesterday.