Contributions
- 12 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions2.1KViews0likes0Comments
Re: Missing unit
It seems the problem is that the unit name isn't the same as the class name. That is, the class is: class TUploadProtocol : public TObject { ... }; And that resides in "protocol.h". AQTime can't see the file or class. However, if I change the file to "uploadprotocol.h" then AQTime now sees the file and class. I think this is a bug, possibly due to AQTime's Delphi heritage. C++ doesn't care about the module name, and neither should AQTime. Is this likely to get fixed?12 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions2.1KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Missing unit
Ummm... so back to my original question: is there a way in which I can determine where the problem resides? I guess checking to see if the function name, etc, appears in the debug info in the exe might do it? If so, given that all I have at the moment is RAD Studio and AQTime, how would I check this?12 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions2.1KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Missing unit
Ah, I didn't realise 7.50 was out. However, I have now upgraded, and it made no difference.12 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions2.1KViews0likes0CommentsMissing unit
I am using the performance profiler on an application generated by C++Builder from RAD Studio 2010. When I add the .exe to the AQTime project all the units are shown except for one. This one, called protocol.cpp defining a class TUploadProtocol in case names might be important, has similar attributes to other units that do appear (so it's not something like the class being instantiated at runtime, or not having a form, etc). As far as I can tell, RAD Studio includes debug info for it (that is, when it is run I can place breakpoints (that work!) on lines in the unit), but AQTime acts as if it doesn't exist. Is this a known problem? If not, is there some way I can figure out whether it is AQTime or RAD Studio (or something else) at fault? OS is W7x64, AQTime is 7.40.12 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions13KViews0likes6Comments- 14 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions1.3KViews0likes0Comments
- 14 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions1.3KViews0likes0Comments
License change
In the V6 EULA I was allowed to install AQTime on my main PC and, additionally, a laptop. In the V7 EULA this has changed to allow only one install on my main PC. Worse, it is a specific PC, and I can de-install just 3 times before I then have to plead my case to Aut^H^H^HSMartBear. Oh, and now I'm forced to install and pollute my development machine with the awful HASP. Additionally, I can't turf this rubbish off to a VM (which I normally do for ill-behaved software) since I'm using a Name User license, which in actuality is a Named PC license. Why do you do this to the customers that are paying your bills? I didn't rip off V6 (didn't even install on my laptop, but it was nice knowing that I could have). As usual, the legitimate well-behaved paying punters get a worse experience than the hackers. Is it really to your benefit that I kick myself and whine "but I paid for this!"? Might I suggest you nip over to the blindingly excellent Visual Slickedit (http://www.slickedit.com) and check out their forum from a year or so ago? They, too, had named user licenses and actually meant it - I could install on any machine I wanted, so long as it was just me using it. Then they changed the license manage to some thing that mucked with boot sectors, on the basis their product was too easy to nick. To cut to the chase, they were persuaded that they were doing the wrong thing, and they pretty soon went back to their old system, leaving they paying customers happy once more. I don't see them out on the streets with their begging bowls. I do see lots of recommendations for their great product and excellent customer service (and not just because I recommend it to anyone that will listen!). "AQTime? Sure, it does the biz but the licensing..."14 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions11KViews0likes4Comments6.30 minor bugette
Just installed 6.30 (thanks very much) and elected to install over my existing installation. When we get to the screen that specifies the program directory I got the default location of c:\program files(x86)\... instead of the existing location of g:\detools\... Also, I note that selecting other than elapsed time for a counter pops up a warning on W7 that doing so will probably crash the OS. As a workaround to this, can AQTime be run in a VMWare virtual machine running, say, XP SP2?15 years agoPlace AQtime QuestionsAQtime Questions13KViews0likes1Comment