ztilleto
New Contributor
Joined 11 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
Contributions
Re: Make a solution based Object Mapping to work on already created projects within the solution
Hi NisHera, That is not posible for Object Mapping. You can either continue on the one that is in the project, or you can change the default Object Mapping, and the default will then be used for new Projects that is created in the solution. But there isn't a way to do a common Onject Mapping, as you can do with all the other things in the system, like, Name Mapping, Sripts, Keywords and so on.3.7KViews0likes0CommentsMake a solution based Object Mapping to work on already created projects within the solution
Make a solution based Object Mapping. This would work so all projects under the solution would automatic have the Object Mapped, and not like it is now, you will need to do the Object Mapping on each of the different Projects within a solution if you have a need to map a new object in.3.8KViews3likes3CommentsRe: Failed to extract any value for the variable
Hi Ryan, Yes, I have taken the "Body" from the respons, and run the Regex on it, and it found 1 item. So there isn't any problems when I ran it manually like that. This is why I can't seem to wrap my head around it, cause either there are some things run to fast on a repsons not given yet or something like that. Regards, Mike2.9KViews0likes0CommentsStep through Debug option
There should be a single step debug option where you at time of post and respons can see what was sent and returned, and then see what was available at the time the variables was to be set. I think that would be a welcome addition as most of your other tools also allow for a step through debugging for verification of the testplan. Regards, Mike3.3KViews1like3CommentsFailed to extract any value for the variable
Hi, I'm testing the LoadComplete to see if we can use it in our comming upgrade of our test setup. However I have run into a problem with a simple flow in our Web Application. When I run the verify of the recording I get "Failed to extract any value for the variable " errors, if I then go to the step in the Scenario and look at the Data Selectors, I have the Selectors that LoadComplete created during recording. If I copy the Body from the Response and then run the Regular Expression on the body, I get a vlid Match. So I am a bit perplexed to this. And as it isn't possible to step through the scenario to see if there are some issues during the run I can't figure out why it isn't possible for the Data Selector to get the value. Hope someone might be able to help or give me some ideas on how to get this working. Thanks for you time. Regards, Mike3KViews0likes3CommentsRe: xpath Decimal Error calculation error
Hi, I'm not sure what you are answering. As the two links you send me just contains information on floor,cieling and round as well as how to do math manipulation. I know how to do that. The error I am seeing isn't that I don't know how to move the coma to do the manipulation, but rather a side effect of doing the math manipulation, that somehow on one of our tests adds a very very small decimal to the outcome when doing the *0.01 on it. Which it shouldn't.1.2KViews0likes0Commentsxpath Decimal Error calculation error
I was doing a rounding calculation test for a testcase I am working on. Where I do a shift to 2 decimals on a float response by *100 round and then /100 again. This however gives me an odd response, where it seems that there are a rounding error somewhere in the SOAP UI system. If I only do the *100 round. It shows correctly. If I do *100 round /10 it shows correct, however if I do /100 it gives an decimal problem where it adds 0.000000000000005 to the result. This is on Soap UI Pro 5.1.1. XPath result. XPathContains comparison failed for path [declare namespace a='http://NordicInsuranceSoftware.WebServices'; declare namespace ns1='http://NordicInsuranceSoftware.WebServices/PolicySales'; round(//ns1:AnswerQuestionResponse[1]/ns1:AnswerQuestionResult[1]/a:Policies[1]/a:PolicyDraftModel[1]/a:Insured[1]/a:InsuredModel[2]/a:CalculationResults[1]/a:CalculationResultModel[4]/a:Value[1]*100)*0.01], expecting [51.62], actual was [51.620000000000005]1.5KViews0likes2Comments