Test end event/trigger

Question

Hi all,
I may be asking the wrong questions so I'll just explain what I'm trying to do:
&nbsp;
When a TestComplete completes running, I am having it go to an url, which is basically a REST api to trigger the next run (we built an internal web app to queue tests).&nbsp;
&nbsp;
So first, I tried putting this rest api trigger at the end of a script. But that's not good enough - because in the event the run gets some exceptions, I dont get to the api part.
&nbsp;
So next, I tried to use a try-catch block to catch any exceptions. If exception, then trigger api. This is slightly better, but what if a run is not going as expected and someone ends the run manually.
&nbsp;
I need a general way to say, if this test complete run finishes, do this.
&nbsp;

alexkaras · Accepted Answer

Hi,
&nbsp;
OnStopTest event (https://support.smartbear.com/testcomplete/docs/reference/events/onstoptest.html) seems to be what you are looking for...

tristaanogre · Answer

Wrapping all the code in a test case in a "try" block is actually not a bad idea...&nbsp; what happens if something unexpected happens during the execution of your test code?&nbsp; The "try" will catch anything unexpected...&nbsp; So, that's really a pretty good practice there.
&nbsp;
As to your "unfortunate"... that's the way events work.... you want code to execute to "handle" an event, you first need to tell the project what events to "handle"... that's what the "GeneralEvents" does...

ksqian · Answer

Thanks! That seems to do the trick.
&nbsp;
Seems like the event code doesnt work unless I add in an actual event to the project. If only there's a code-only solution...&nbsp;
&nbsp;
But thats okay! This will do for now.&nbsp;

tristaanogre · Answer

A code only solution would be try/catch/finally.... in the "Finally" block, trigger your code.&nbsp; Finally will run ALWAYS... if there's an exception, "catch" will run... then "finally" runs.&nbsp; If there is no exception, the "catch" block is ignored but "finally" still runs.

ksqian · Answer

Thanks!
&nbsp;
I think try catch wasnt ideal because it doesn't guarantee that the test will end in the try block, so it can't reach catch/finally.
&nbsp;
I can put the entire code&nbsp;inside a try block,&nbsp;but I feel that's a bigger sin. The event based solution seems perfect. Its just unfortunate it only works when you add "Events =&gt; GeneralEvents" onto the project itself.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
On top of that I also had to add:
&nbsp;
function GeneralEvents_OnStopTest(Sender)
{
  Common.openUrl("http://localhost:1337/next")
}

ksqian · Answer

Yeah it'd be nice if they expose the event names so we can act upon it.
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Can't I just tell it what events to handle inside the code ? It works like other frameworks out there where its like button.on('click') where click is just a built in event. So if I say onStopTest in the code, the code should just compile and add a listener for the stop event automatically...
&nbsp;
I think the try block may be stylistic preference. Actually I'd be surprised if I manually stop the run manually if it will even run the 'finally' block at all, since the code executions just stops. But I can test that out for the curiosity.&nbsp;

Forum Discussion

Test end event/trigger

7 Replies

Related Content

End-to-end workflow automation

End to end test cases Generations

Test Complete From End is Inconsistent

How to automatically end remote session without stopping UI Testing

Inter-linking other end-point docs, dynamically.

Recent Discussions

TestComplete14.72 is not recognizing WinUI-3 objects

Floating window bleep overlapping window takes longer time (~10 min) to click the button on it.

Test case randomly fails with "parent object was not found"

Does TC have a .within() method similar to Cypress.io?

SessionCreator /Timeout option not firing EventControl_OnTimeout