Hi
@venkireddy1991Just to reiterate what Rao has already stated and to add a bit of additional detail.
Using .json and .xml as an example, you get wellformed checks and valid checks.
Wellformed (which checks a file to ensure it corresponds to wellformed syntax rules (which is doneby the parser). Wellformed checks are done by the parser so no additional file is required. Simply put, the file to be checked by the parser is all thats required.
Valid checks (known as schema valid/invalid) check the content of a file conforms to rules defined in ANOTHER file (known as the schema) and these schema valid rules check content, format, datatypes, field lengths, value format/pattern etc. and all these rules are defined in the schema.
Quite often the terminology can be a confused....e.g. a lot of online json validators dont check for validation, they simply check to ensure the file is wellformed.....i.e. to check a file is valid on these online tools, youd have to load up the schema file first and then load of the file you want to ensure is valid and the tool would then compare the and file to ensure it conforms to the rules defined in your schema (the first file loaded in my example).
Your openAPI/swagger .json file is the definition (the schema itself) so you can only check the .yaml files wellformedness.
ReadyAPI! doesn't include a function to check wellformedness independently. The wellformed check is done by whichever ReadyAPI! Parser is executed when a file is loaded into ReadyAPI!
If the file loads with no errors being reported, by definition, the file has been parsed and checked for wellformedness and it has passed the wellformed check. Only if errors were reported (hindering successfully loading in your openAPI file) would the file be malformed.
As i said your file IS the schema so you can only check to ensure its not malformed.
Best case you can check the files youll be submitting against your openAPI .yaml (the schema) to ensure your files are schema valid.
Hope the above has clarified a bit,
Nice one,
Rich
if this helped answer the post, could you please mark it as 'solved'? Also if you consider whether the title of your post is relevant? Perhaps if the post is solved, it might make sense to update the Subject header field of the post to something more descriptive? This will help people when searching for problems. Ta
