Forum Discussion

chandreshp's avatar
chandreshp
Occasional Contributor
12 years ago

TestComplete integration with TestRail

Hi,  I am using TestRail to manage my Test suites and I am using TestComplete to perform automation testing of my application. TestComplete allows to set log defects to JIRA. But doe...
leandropoblet's avatar
leandropoblet
Frequent Contributor
10 years ago

Hi Colin,

 

From the original usage post I'm trying the simplest one "retestCase" which has no comments, no version, only test run and test case numbers as explained in the post.

 

 

//USEUNIT TestRail

function testUpdateTestRail() {
    testrail.retestCase(4683, 866867);
    testrail.passCase(4683, 866868, {version: 'Build 10.0.0.1234'});
    testrail.blockedCase(4683, 866869, {comment: 'Blocked due to JIRA-4321'});
    testrail.failCase(4683, 866870, {comment: 'Failed. JIRA-5678 logged.', version: 'Build 10.0.0.1234'});
}

 

joseph_michaud's avatar
joseph_michaud
Icon for Staff rankStaff
10 years ago

Everything goes through testrail.addResultForCase() to do a POST.  Is sendPost() having a problem trying to parse dataObj created in the call?  For the purpose of experimentation, what would happen if you hacked it to post something simple (like a string)?

 

 

testrail.addResultForCase = function(runId, caseId, additionalFields) {
    // dataObj = testrail.dataDictonary(additionalFields);
    testrail.sendPost("add_result_for_case/" + runId + "/" + caseId, "simplestring");
};

Do you still get the parse exception?