I still consider an automated test case that failed to run due to an exception as a "FAIL". It may not have failed due to an application problem, but it still failed. Something went wrong. In your case, that something is a problem with the automation code. Since it failed to run as automated, that means that someone, in your regression cycle, needs to run it manually.
As for your request... I don't believe so. It retrieves back the log information from the test. All "errors" are logged the same, regardless of if they are test failures are code errors.