Forum Discussion
han
16 years agoContributor
My idea was to report all differences as warnings then to have two Log.Link with PASSED/FAILED.
The PASSED link would run a bat file that updated the compare image so that the next time the difference would be in the "reference" picture and the test would pass.
The FAILED link would run a bat file that reported the the difference as a bug.
This would be possible if the log.link was able to use the "link" the same way as the windows run.
Is there a reason that the Log.Link doesn't work in the same way as the windows run?
The PASSED link would run a bat file that updated the compare image so that the next time the difference would be in the "reference" picture and the test would pass.
The FAILED link would run a bat file that reported the the difference as a bug.
This would be possible if the log.link was able to use the "link" the same way as the windows run.
Is there a reason that the Log.Link doesn't work in the same way as the windows run?