Unfortunately, I do not have any performance tips to provide. But, I would like to add, however, that we are having a similar issue with namemapping in TC11. The performance declined significantly between TC10 and TC11.
I'd be very curious to hear any suggestions from other users and/or SmartBear.
Cheers,
Hi Kris,
apart from the issues regarding TestComplete 11 I try to improve my namemapping in general.
I am not sure that I have done everything the best way possible.
Especially I am not sure if removing all elements that are not needed for the test itself (like some .cell., .panel., .table., ...) from both mappings (mapped objects as well as aliases) and just keeping some elements (the ones that are actually needed in the tests (either clicked or screenshoted). With all these elements having extended find enabled. This way sometimes lots of levels are cut out between two mapped objects which (I assume) causes the not too fast recognition of objects.
Best regards,
Joachim
Hi Guys,
As far as I know, our R&D team is currently working on improving the NameMapping feature. Thus, I strongly recommend that you contact our Team and report the issues you have with NameMapping. If you provided them with the steps to reproduce issues, we would fix it for sire. You can send your request to TestComplete Support Team ( http://support.smartbear.com/product-list/ ).
Hi Tanya,
I already registered a bug and am in contact with Dimitry.
But apart from that I just want to know if I can improve anything in my work with the namemapping.
Best regards,
Joachim
