Forum Discussion

larolsen's avatar
larolsen
Contributor
13 years ago

9.31 namemapping performance is poor

Hi



In our testsuite we have a large namemapping file. When I want to access an alias it takes about 5 times as long in 9.31 than in 9.20 until the alias is shown.



If I write "Call Aliases.Sys.OurAUT. "  then it takes a couple of seconds to show the available aliases in 9.20, and in 9.31 it's about 10 seconds. And it is not just for the first access of aliases, it's everytime I access the aliases, like the aliases tree is not cached.



Is there a work-a-round for this? Will this be adressed in TC10? (We are thinking about downgrading to 9.20 again, due to this issue)



/Lars

4 Replies

  • TanyaYatskovska's avatar
    TanyaYatskovska
    Icon for Alumni rankAlumni
    12 years ago

    Hi Lars,


     


    What Store Code Completion information are you using? If you keep full information about objects, some delays are possible. Please refer to the "Name Mapping Editor" article for more information.


     

  • larolsen's avatar
    larolsen
    Contributor
    12 years ago
    Hi



    Sorry for the late reply. In our project we use Store Full Data, and we have a very large namemapping file. Actually now the performance is better (not good, but better). So I guess some of the delay must be caused by processes outside TC.



    Best regards

    Lars Lund Olsen
  • TanyaYatskovska's avatar
    TanyaYatskovska
    Icon for Alumni rankAlumni
    12 years ago

    Hi Lars,


     


    Could you please check the size of the <Your TestComplete Project>\NameMapping\NameMapping.tcNM file?


     


    BTW, we have released TestComplete 10 recently. You can request the trial to evaluate it.


     

  • larolsen's avatar
    larolsen
    Contributor
    12 years ago
    Hi again



    Our current namemapping file is just over 84 MB. We will definately look in to TC10 as soon as time permits :-)



    /Lars