Forum Discussion
tstmartin
12 years agoContributor
Hmmm ... so I went and tried one more time to use the Refactor Definition, and it ran reasonably quickly.
No idea what changed.
Still not useful, though - every test step and assertion and property transfer has the original namespace, so while the port binding information is updateable, every test step has to be modified by hand. That obviously wont work.
Something else that is interesting - the PortBinding namespace after the Refactor does not show as having been changed unless I close the project and then reload it.
Memory consumption just keeps climbing still. Started out at 780Mb, now up to 1.8G after refactoring 5 PortBindings, and saving and reloading the project a few times.
Executing GC in the memory log window has no apparent effect.
No idea what changed.
Still not useful, though - every test step and assertion and property transfer has the original namespace, so while the port binding information is updateable, every test step has to be modified by hand. That obviously wont work.
Something else that is interesting - the PortBinding namespace after the Refactor does not show as having been changed unless I close the project and then reload it.
Memory consumption just keeps climbing still. Started out at 780Mb, now up to 1.8G after refactoring 5 PortBindings, and saving and reloading the project a few times.
Executing GC in the memory log window has no apparent effect.
Related Content
- 5 years ago
- 7 years ago
Recent Discussions
- 6 days ago
- 10 days ago