ws-security
I try to intercept encrypted soap message with soapui. The reference site of WS Security with wildfly 8 and eclipse ide is https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/JBWS/WS-Security#WS-Security-Authenticationandauthorization WS Security implementation is successful and the response message is encrypted successfully. The main key in WS security is manifest.mf. I add the following lines in manifest.mf file and it works well in eclipse ide. Manifest-Version: 1.0 Dependencies: org.apache.cxf.impl, org.apache.ws.security services Class-Path: But in soapui application soap message encryption is failed. Me reference site is http://www.soapui.org/soapui-projects/ws-security.html http://blog.thilinamb.com/2011/02/invoking-secured-web-service-with.html The SEI throws the following exception. <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soap:Body> <soap:Fault> <faultcode>soap:Server</faultcode> <faultstring>These policy alternatives can not be satisfied: {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}ProtectionToken {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}IncludeTimestamp: Received Timestamp does not match the requirements {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}SymmetricBinding: Received Timestamp does not match the requirements {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}EndorsingSupportingTokens: The received token does not match the endorsing supporting token requirement {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}X509Token: The received token does not match the token inclusion requirement {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}EncryptedParts: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Body not ENCRYPTED {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}SignedParts: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Body not SIGNED</faultstring> </soap:Fault> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope> The same exception was thrown in eclipse ide when I did not add the Dependancies line in manifest.mf file. Do you think those are related and have the same configuration problem? Your advice will be deeply appreciated. Thanks