Log Folder Items, Set the Icon while inside the stack (or auto detect on some hiearchy)
I thought this should just be a feature already and I posted asking for help to get it to work. https://community.smartbear.com/t5/TestComplete-General-Discussions/Log-Folder-Icon-Checkpoint-Over-Message-Javascript/m-p/200736#M37434 The log folders are real nice for cleaning up the logs but they only change Icon's if the Folder contains an Error or a Warning. I want LogFolders to show a green if it contains a checkpoint. A common sense order of importance Error > Warning > Checkpoint > Message. Instead it's showing Error > Warning > Message. I think it should even auto detect based on the Log item's priority that has been set. Or just a method to hit ie, Log.CurrentStack(iconWarning, priorityHigh); function TestScriptLog() { Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Error"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Error("Error in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Error"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder"); Log.Error("Error in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Warning"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Warning"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Checkpoint"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Checkpoint"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Informational"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Informational"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); }
Chromium Embedded Browser support for version 102 and above
The current version ofChromium Embedded Browser supported by TestComplete is 88, but we need to develop automation for applications having version 102 and above, hence request to support the version 102 and above for achieving greater automation coverage using TestComplete.Limit Amount of Logs Kept by Time Frame
Instead of limiting the number of logs kept by Test Complete by a count, it would be nice if it they could be limited by a time period. For example, keep the last Month of test logs. This would be useful for users who run a high volume of tests in a short amount of time, but would still like to keep their output logs under control and accessible.
choose monitor for logging
Hey, it would be great if the log would not display the whole screen from 3 monitors which are in use. Better would be that TestComplete checks where the tested application runs and just make screenshots for the log from this monitor - or implement an option to choose which monitor should be logged. Attached is a screenshot from a log with 3 monitors.Specify Filename of Screenshot with Post Screenshot Operation
The screenshots in the Log files on the file directory would be much more useful outside of Test Complete if you could specify the filename when the screenshot is taken. Ideally, you would be able to specify the filenames always, but at least it should be an option to specify the filename of a screenshot when one uses the Post Screenshot Operation.
Add image into the Test Visualiser when using If object exists in keyword view
When creating an If Object exists/not exists condition in keyword view, is it possible to also show the object in the Test Visualiser. Sometimes the Name Mapping shown is not at all obvious what it is actually checking, so a image to see would be useful and quicker than having to look in the Name Mappings to see the objects image.
