iFrame-based application.
When working with iFrame based application we need to give with specific command line arguments which if not used results in errors. If the command line arguments are used a message is received indicating "You are using an unsupported command-line flage: --disable-site-isolation-trials. Stability and security will suffer". Can this be addressed to allow us to work with TestComplete seamlessly ? B.R Minas
TestComplete command line options - specify multiple individual tests
Scenario: At times, when executing our entire test suite, several tests fail and need to be re-executed. The tests may be spread across multiple script files in the project. Request: The ability to run multiple individual tests via the command line, similar to other test runners such as pytest. Example of pytest syntax (line breaks added for clarity "^"): python -m pytest ^ tests/test_unit_name1.py::routine_name1 ^ tests/test_unit_name3.py::routine_name6 ^ tests/test_unit_name2.py::routine_name3 Example of what TestComplete/TestExecute syntax might look like: TestExecute.exe file_name /run ^ /project:project_name1 /unit:unit_name1 /routine:routine_name1 ^ /project:project_name1 /unit:unit_name3 /routine:routine_name6 ^ /project:project_name1 /unit:unit_name2 /routine:routine_name3
Request for Enhanced Command Line Option to Generate Single HTML Log File in TestExecute/TestCmplete
Hi, when we use the following command line: "C:\Program Files (x86)\SmartBear\TestExecute 15\x64\Bin\TestExecute.exe" "C:\Users\USridhar\Documents\TestComplete 15 Projects\ProjectSuite3\ProjectSuite3.pjs" /run /p:TestProject1 /exportLog:"E:\Testing\Test6.html" /e We are receiving multiple .html files, but we need only a single HTML file named Test6.html. We prefer not to use .mht files as they are not compatible with Chrome and Firefox.Log Folder Items, Set the Icon while inside the stack (or auto detect on some hiearchy)
I thought this should just be a feature already and I posted asking for help to get it to work. https://community.smartbear.com/t5/TestComplete-General-Discussions/Log-Folder-Icon-Checkpoint-Over-Message-Javascript/m-p/200736#M37434 The log folders are real nice for cleaning up the logs but they only change Icon's if the Folder contains an Error or a Warning. I want LogFolders to show a green if it contains a checkpoint. A common sense order of importance Error > Warning > Checkpoint > Message. Instead it's showing Error > Warning > Message. I think it should even auto detect based on the Log item's priority that has been set. Or just a method to hit ie, Log.CurrentStack(iconWarning, priorityHigh); function TestScriptLog() { Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Error"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Error("Error in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Error"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder"); Log.Error("Error in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Warning"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Warning"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.Warning("Warning in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Checkpoint"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmNormal); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be a Checkpoint"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.Checkpoint("Checkpoint in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Informational"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder","",pmHighest); Log.PopLogFolder(); Log.AppendFolder("This folder Icon should be an Informational"); Log.Message("Informational in Folder"); Log.PopLogFolder(); }
Ability to run the Testcomplete testcase using API and pass data to testcases externally on api call
Pls refer Case #00555209 for more information. We want to have ability to run the Testcomplete testcase using API and pass data to testcases externally on api call. Data is dynamic and should not be saved with the automated tests.Chromium Embedded Browser support for version 102 and above
The current version of Chromium Embedded Browser supported by TestComplete is 88, but we need to develop automation for applications having version 102 and above, hence request to support the version 102 and above for achieving greater automation coverage using TestComplete.Add more log information on Jenkins Smartbear Plugin TestComplete Test Console Output log
Currently there it is just logged with what exe & version & parameters passed. From past experience it would be good to have following details logged too: Configured session details - Run interactive user session flag - Use active session flag - Session screen resolution (sample 2560x1440) The real facts from the Session Desktop during test execution - Is it an interactive user session? - Is an already active session used or did the test runner created a new one? - Session screen resolution (sample 1679x551 which does not match the requested one see above)Ability to search where keywordtest/script is being used in other keywordtests.
as an example I made a few keywordtests that calculated certain dates. now in my project explorer there is no way to know where this test is being used. I try to use test parameters for a lot of things to reuse the tests in other places. that way i dont rewrite teststeps multiple times The same for Script functions. if i want to know where this function is being used it would be nice to see where this test/script is referenced.File Diff utility.
Hi, It would be very helpful to be able to parameterize the command line located in Tools--> Options --> Engines --> Stores. Currently we can pass as param only the file name. It would be nice if we could pass as param the entire command line or the folder a file resides as we need to have test scripts for various environments.Get and Evaluate Response of Batch-Script as Tested App
In some cases it is useful / necessary to run a batch script from Testcomplete. Unfortunately Testcomplete can't get back the status code from the batch file to get the information if the script was executed successful or not. In many cases it would be useful to get back the status code at the keyword level of Testcomplete, for example: - execute a program to do some taks as pre condition for the following teststeps - execute some testcases with a batch file that can't be executed by Testcomplete directly, like python testcases with the pytest framework
