ContributionsMost RecentMost LikesSolutionsRe: accessing images Thanks for letting us now the outcome of your conversation. I sense a little frustration :P Re: accessing images I don't know why that would be but will try to help. Do you get an error message you can share? Copying D0UG who may be able to help also Re: accessing images If you don't get an answer from the community (I can't help on this occasion), you can reach Smartbear support here: SmartBear Support Re: Test Executions - No Test Cycle, how to edit / delete? You're not the only one with this issue. We don't have the ability to update test executions and assign these ad-hoc executions to test cycles. I don't like this feature either and think that all test executions should only be executable if assigned to a test cycle, but there's no way around it that I'm aware of. Fortunately, in my projects I have come across this issue very rarely Re: no permission A couple of things I would try: Go to Project Settings > Apps > Zephyr Scale and check your permissions settings. Turn them off if you want to have no restrictions. Check with your Jira administrator to see if there is anything odd going on with your permissions to the project. Contact SmartBear support for help - SmartBear Support Re: Zephyr Test Case Issue Type & Issue Key It's not possible to edit test case keys, so the custom field option would work. Alternatively, you could add your own test case key number as a prefix in your test case name, e.g. Own0001: Test this, Own0002 Test that, etc. That way, you will be able to sort test cases by Name and they will appear in order of your own keys, and your your testers will see the key in the test player. Re: Test execn. outside Test Cycles _HELP I agree. All executions should go through a test cycle. It's critical to have that structure to ensure that reporting is consistent and accurate. Let's hope this is resolved in a future release. Re: IS there a way to create a report in Zephyr that includes the attachments? I'm guessing you want to evidence that tests have been successful by viewing the testers' uploaded results. I don't think that's possible - there is no option I've seen to include attachments in reports. Would a custom execution status or custom execution field, denoting that an attachment exists or has been evidenced, suffice? That is something you could report against and include as a filter in your reports. Re: Test execn. outside Test Cycles _HELP Ah.... so I think you're talking about the ability for the AI automation feature to execute tests directly from a test case, which I can see how that could happen. I'm not using that tool at the moment but agree that it should be controlled - there's a cost element to it! Re: Latest Update... :( Glad to hear things are in a better place. I've marked your update post as a solution as it seems like you don't have anything you need help with.