ContributionsMost RecentMost LikesSolutionsRe: Structural error at paths./ Found the problem (I think). Turns out that Swagger doesn't seem to like the word GET and expects it to be get instead. Who'd have guessed it was that finicky 🙂 Structural error at paths./ Completely new to Swagger, and I'm getting the error in the subject for the following JSON code (btw, this example of code is basically copied from a swagger created by an "expert" here at work. Trouble is, their code also fails the swagger editor test in the same way. { "swagger": "2.0", "info": { "title": "--API-title--", "version": "1.0.0", "description": " --API-description--" }, "host": "our.host.at.work", "basePath": "/my/basepath", "schemes": [ "https" ], "paths": { "/": { "GET": { "tags": [ "JPB261" ], "summary": "", "description": "endpoint desc", "produces": [ "application/json" ], "parameters": [ The error message I'm getting is Structural error at paths./ should NOT have additional properties additionalProperty: GET Jump to line 14 Could any kind soul tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thank you Shared workspaces First of all, I'm a newbie to Soap UI. There are a number of us developers in our group. The concept of workspaces seems a simple and logical way to split test cases. Let's assume I need to test a program (ABC123) and i have 2 test environments (env1 & env2). We DON'T want to create loads of private test cases, so the logical (?) answer is to put them all on a network drive that everyone can access. The next step (?) would be to create one workspace that ONLY contains ABC123 för env1 and another one that contains ABC123 for env2. My question is this. If I open the env1 workspace, what happens if someone else ALSO opens it while I'm still using it? Do they get any sort of a warning. Next question. If I add a test case to env1 and the other person adds a different test case as well to their copy, is it a case of "the last one to save is happy, the first one is left wondering what happened to their case". Thanks SolvedLaunching testrunner First of all, I'm a total newbie to Soap. We use it to test online CICS transactions and we're using the free version. I hope you can see from the attached screen capture (SC) what I'm doing at the moment. I make copies of the test scenarios and create them as Test steps (excuse me if my nomenclature is incorrect). The Test steps are those outlined in Pink in the SC, and the ones I'd like to run instead are those outlined in orange. Now I have to say that Soap is great when it comes to createing copies/clones, REALLY simple, but I'm wondering if I NEED to. The advantage (to me) with the pink options is that I can decide to send the output to files on my C-drive and then run a program that strips out extraneous details and merges all the files into one. A simple way of creating a before/after file that I can then use something like Beyond Compare to see if I've ruined any exitsing test cases. By marking the Test Steps in the pink area, I can select Case and then Launch Testrunner and do this, something I can't do with the equivelant orange GetClaim option (somewhat hidden). What I would like to do (unless I'm complicating things through my lack of knowledge) is to skip the cloning of the orange test cases to the pink ones and run all the orange ones, BUT ensuring the output results end up in one or more files. Is this doable ????