ContributionsMost RecentMost LikesSolutionsRe: Download no longer working? That just directs to the same place that had the problem. That is, this page, which doesn't auto-download: https://www.soapui.org/downloads/thank-you-for-downloading-soapui/ With the same direct download link: https://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.eviware/soapuios/5.7.0/SoapUI-x64-5.7.0.exe But... that link is working this morning. So it must have been a temporary problem. :shrug: Download no longer working? Trying to download from https://www.soapui.org/downloads/soapui/ Leading to this: https://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.eviware/soapuios/5.7.0/SoapUI-x64-5.7.0.exe Is resulting in an XML response with the following content: <Error> <Code>AccessDenied</Code> <Message>Access Denied</Message> <RequestId>84FXKY4JKJX9RWD2</RequestId> <HostId> GfFhbZNDrYCFpgU5n6KjO09hsNsG295RcUND7orOueHQi07EasNg0lb0ZoE1sVRdNYiR2rDme3g= </HostId> </Error> SolvedRe: Documentation Export with inherited types is incorrect So I can't export HTML and get a flat display of the types? That would make me quit using hierarchical types. I don't want viewers of my HTML exports to have to be exposed to that confusing syntax 😞 (Just to be clear, I'm not talking about the pretty formatting/display, but about the exposure of the internal type hierarchy with each method.) Documentation Export with inherited types is incorrect I have an openapi: 3.0.0 API where I've used type inheritance for some requests & responses, and when I view those in the SwaggerHub editor or viewer, they look as I want/expect: all the fields collapsed into a flat object: But when I export the file to HTML, I instead get a very confusing view of all the nested "all of" elements. How can I get the exported documentation to look like the online documentation in this regard? Re: REST, MockAction, using template parameters in ResourcePath Sounds like you actually have to script a mock request at the highest level of the REST resource hierarchy :-( https://stackoverflow.com/a/37343814/796761 Which is a major pain. Because our API's REST resources are subpaths of each other, and you can't use template parameters or wildcards in mock patterns. So I'd have to script the entire base path or create all kinds of duplicates with hardcoded values, in order to distinguish, say, /calendar-backend/public/api/v1/services from /calendar-backend/public/api/v1/services/1/branches from /calendar-backend/public/api/v1/services/2/branches Re: Mock (REST) service, as a (mostly) passthroughNo thanks. For my particular case, writing a bunch of code isn't worthwhile. Thanks.Re: Mock (REST) service, as a (mostly) passthroughYes, I probably could recreate the issue that way. I was just hoping there was some trivial way to pass requests through instead. That would address the other StackOverflow request as well.Mock (REST) service, as a (mostly) passthrough I'd like to create a Mock service that mostly acts as a pass-through to a real service that we use, but be able to quickly make one particular request fail in a particular way, so that I can address a particular case we've seen. Anybody have advice or example script on the simplest way to simply pass an incoming request & response through a mock operation? (Similar desire for a different use case, from this StackOverflow question, BTW: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36041434/soapui-create-mock-service-with-pass-through-behavior-for-selected-methods ) SolvedRe: REST Basic Authentication error at endpoint levelNo, I do not believe this is fixed. It's been a while, but looking back at my screenshots, it looks like I've seen the problem with both http and https URLs.Re: automatically add request header to all calls I know this is really old, but in case somebody finds it via web search: You can (at least now) add "Header" parameters up at the Resource level. They'll be copied down to all requests under them.