Please bring TestComplete's HighlightObject method equivalent to Testleft!! https://support.smartbear.com/testcomplete/docs/reference/test-objects/members/common-for-sys-desktop-pda/highlightobject-method-sys-pda-object.html
... View more
Hello. We would like the option to go back one step when browsing around inside a object property.
... View more
Status:
Implemented
Submitted on
04-27-2016
05:49 AM
Submitted by
AlexKaras
on
04-27-2016
05:49 AM
Hi,
I would like to ask to bring the Point-and-Fix Object Browser functionality available in TestComplete's Object Spy to TestLeft. This functionality is extremely useful when investigating and capturing properties of dynamic objects like context menus, submenus, etc.
... View more
Hi, we made a lot of script extensions for TestComplete (Custom Keywords and Runtime Objects). I would like to convert our custom keywords from JScript to C#. It would be great to have the keywords as deployable dlls, and shown up as keyword on TestComplete, which we can drag'n'drop via TestComplete UI to arrange keyword test scripts. For this it would be necessary to have a regarding Extension folder below of TestComplete which will accept the dlls in the same way as it do for normal ScriptExtensions as it is for now. TestComplete the specific folder like "..TestComplete/Bin/Extensions/Extensions/ScriptExtensions" as before etc. maybe some folder like "..TestComplete/Bin/Extensions/TestLeft/OurDllFolder". After deploy our users would open TestComplete and work as before. From my developer perspective, i would have the benefit of TestLeft but would also ensure that our users could work in the same way. It would be easier to debug our converted scriptextensions byTestLeft and use these converted script extensions for normal use by TestComplete We also had the benefit to use MSTest for the keyword dlls to test the code by TestLeft and VisualStudio. Regards, Norman
... View more
Status:
New Idea
Submitted on
08-30-2018
10:52 AM
Submitted by
jonathan_meyer
on
08-30-2018
10:52 AM
When using TestLeft to test our WPF application, I have to add some composite controls to the list of things that the UI spy can see. It would be really awesome if the UI spy could remember those controls that are added when not running a test. Right now, if I am developing tests and there is an object that the UI spy can't initially see into, I have to start debugging a test, wait for it to hit a breakpoint, and then I can use the UI spy to see what I need.
If the UI spy could somehow remember all of the composite controls that were set the last time a test was run, it would make things a lot quicker and easier for me as I write my tests.
... View more
Status:
New Idea
Submitted on
09-26-2017
02:54 AM
Submitted by
vijayeleswarapu
on
09-26-2017
02:54 AM
As of now we see only samples given in JScript /Java Script for TestComplete documentation, given samples for c# are not accurate. Would request for similar samples created technology wise in TestLeft Documentation. Example: Samples for Delphi and Infragistic controls for TestLeft in c#.
... View more
It would be nice if TestLeft could be used not only with .NET Framework, but .NET Core as well. That is currently not possible with the libraries TestLeft ships with, since they are all .NET Framework libs.
... View more
Hi,
A feature request for image comparison build in to TestLeft.
Probably doesn't have to be as full featured as TestComplete but something would be great!
m
... View more
Hello. We would like the option to use the TestLeft UI Spy to browse a object that no longer exists. This is relevant for us because we have custom context menus so we cannot use the suggested approach: https://support.smartbear.com/testleft/docs/using/creating-tests/simulating-user-actions/menu-actions.html In TestComplete we can use Point and Fix and then browse inside the property to find what we need although the context menu would go away in the meantime. We could also find the return type of all the avaliable properties. In TestLeft UI Spy, we can use Point and Fix to find the context menu, but we cannot browse inside the avaliable properies, and we cannot see the return type of some of them either(which are only avaliable through the IObject interface).
... View more
I eagerly await a release of TestLeft that can be installed inside Eclipse. My developers use Eclipse/Spring Tool Suite and would like to start getting into test writing and investigating how TestComplete sees objects on the screen. Is there any estimate for when this might be available?
... View more
As per the following forum thread, the FindAll method would be a very useful addition to TestLeft: https://community.smartbear.com/t5/TestLeft/FindAll-method/m-p/119594#M8
... View more
When selecting a method from an object in UI Spy tool, there is no way to know what parameters are expected for a given method.
That was possible for TestComplete and was extremely useful. A descrition of the method or propery was displayed too.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Hello. We would like the option to search object properties and methods in the TestLeft UI Spy.
... View more
While in TestComplete it was possible to get access to the ClipBoard Content using https://support.smartbear.com/testcomplete/docs/reference/test-objects/members/common-for-sys-desktop-pda/clipboard-property.html As far as I know that's not possible using TestLeft. It would be greate to enable this e.g. by supporting IDriver or IDesktop.ClipboardContent
... View more
- We would like to have the opportunity to open and close new folders on the left side of the log (section "Log Tree").
- We would like to have the opportunity to fill the "Call Stack"-register of the log.
- We would like to have the opportunity to format the log entries. E.g. color options or symbols would be nice.
... View more
It would have very useful have the possiblity to set the driver options in TestLeft UI Spy
... View more
The actual find API aren't very confortable, it would be very useful to have the possibility querying the UI tree by XPath, i.e. driver.find("//Window[@caption="A window"])
... View more
In the UI Spy it is not possible to navigate down objects that have items because there is no way to specify parameters to properties or methods from the UI Spy.
That was possible with TestComplete and was extremely helpful when debugging or discovering new objects in the visual tree.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Hi all,
I suspect it's in the pipeline but support for TestLeft tests on crossbrowsertesting.com would be great.
Thanks
m
... View more
Sometimes the UI Spy object identification includes properties that have values which are not useful for identification. For example a localized property value that can change after changing the SUTs language/region. It would be useful, if it was possible to exclude those properties if they are not needed for a unique search path of that object.
... View more
