Showing ideas with status Accepted for Discussion.
Show all ideas
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
09-04-2017
02:00 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
09-04-2017
02:00 AM
I would like LoadComplete to support integration with versioning systems (like SVN, other systems might be welcome as well). Just like TestComplete has support for SVN. Please vote if you would love to see this implemented as well.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-14-2017
04:13 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-14-2017
04:13 AM
Having created multiple test items, I noticed that the test conditions (load profile/continuous load settings/think time settings/QoS etc are not on the level of specific test items, but are on the global level.... (for all test items). Is this logical? I mean I can think of an approach you want different load profiles for different test items. See attached screenshot. I have created 2 test items, but I can only set the settings on the general level... I want LC to be improved so that I can set different load scenario's for different test items. Same counts for Think Time as illustrated in the screenshot. I know it's possible to create different tests and have different Load scenarios for them but I am specifically pointing the fact on running tests in parallel.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-13-2017
08:21 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-13-2017
08:21 AM
I run the test on 4 connected stations. (using 4 instances of LC's Remote Agent). In the report I can't make any distinction on response speed/transfer speed/ TTFB/TTLB on specific machine. I am not reffering to server metrics like CPU, but more on connection info, and graphs which can make distinctions between the tested machines (Remote Agents). For example I want to see difference between average Page Load time for machine 1 compared to machine 2. Another example: I want to compare values of average TTFB of machine 1 and average TTFB on machine 3, etc..
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-13-2017
05:27 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-13-2017
05:27 AM
Currently, when you disable the option to launch a specific browser, you cannot select option "record traffic from this browser only" . (it's only enabled if you enable the launch option). Consider this scenario: I don't want LC to start a browser, however I only want to record data from browser Chrome. In current setup, this is not possible. So, I want LC to be updated to support this scenario.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-02-2017
05:29 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-02-2017
05:29 AM
I am missing a feature to easily enable/disable created lines in validations / data extractor modules. By creating a feature that easily enable/disables them (using checkboxes) it's easier to work with LC. See attached screenshot for illustration.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
11-16-2017
04:56 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
11-16-2017
04:56 AM
Provide option to Copy (and Paste) Tests. Selecting Copy (option to be added in the context menu) copies selected test to memory. Pasting them (option to be added in the context menu), pastes them : [samename]_02 (or something like that).
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
10-31-2017
05:16 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
10-31-2017
05:16 AM
Right now, it's hard to get an overview on which Requests have Data Extractors and Data Validators in them, within a specific scenario. Could LoadComplete be improved so that markers could be placed on the requests which have Data Selectors and/or Validators in them. See below screenshot:
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
10-27-2017
04:43 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
10-27-2017
04:43 AM
Please improve LoadComplete so that the tester can add notes to the test log so he/she can set (personal) notes (like test environment specifics), because a lot of relevant test log specific data is not set in the log. See attached screenshot for illustration:
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
10-26-2017
01:53 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
10-26-2017
01:53 AM
Similar to this request, I would have LoadComplete to be able to use project variables as values for Page Think Times. Use case: with this implementation you can run the test at different speeds (for specific pages!) easily. See below screenshot:
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
09-22-2017
03:40 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
09-22-2017
03:40 AM
I would like LoadComplete to be able to save / export request headers /bodies and response header/bodies? Why? because we need to analyse specific requests and responses and want to use Excel for analysis.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
08-30-2017
07:41 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
08-30-2017
07:41 AM
My Load test framework contains several loops. Currently, LoadComplete does not take into account the progress within each loop, when displaying the progress indicator. I would like to see some form of progress calculation within the currently active loop so I can see how progress is within the loop
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
07-05-2017
07:21 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
07-05-2017
07:21 AM
For the application we need to test to work well, we need to start browser Chrome with a setup option: " --allow-running-insecure-content" Right now, this scenario is not supported in LoadComplete, since you can only select caching mode: Currently, there is not an option to set any chrome startup flags, so if you enable the option "Launch Web browser", Chrome is started (by LoadComplete), there is no way to control Chrome (or any other browser) setup behaviour.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-22-2017
08:54 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-22-2017
08:54 AM
Currently you can only set QoS (value for page load time, TTFB) values for tests. However I need to be able to set QoS on specific pages (or even better) specific requests/responses. So in my opinion LC could be improved by implementing QoS values on requests/responses. See attached screenshot.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-19-2017
05:12 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-19-2017
05:12 AM
Currently, it's not possible to quickly enable/disable specific entries you have specified in the filter sections. Please include enable/disable checkboxes (on line level), so that enable/disabling can be done more easily. See attached screenshot.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-14-2017
01:51 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-14-2017
01:51 AM
Currently, there is no way to easy enable/disable a test item in Test Editor. Only way to disable an item is to delete an item, or add an item to enable it again. See attached screenshot. I'd suggest to add an item Enabled, with checkboxes for each test item in the list, so that quickly enabling/disabling of test items is possible.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-13-2017
08:02 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-13-2017
08:02 AM
There is currently lacking a horizontal graph bar in the Custom Graph section - therefore not possible to view the last part of the graph - Please include a horizontal scroll bar in this screen.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
06-13-2017
04:11 AM
Submitted by
mgroen2
on
06-13-2017
04:11 AM
Currently the emulated connection speed, is not displayed anywhere in the report. Please include this in the General Info section. Thanks.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
03-29-2017
06:22 AM
Submitted by
PaulHill
on
03-29-2017
06:22 AM
When editing a tests requests, allow the users to set up the screens as they need them for that session or user, and have a lock button so that for each request, the work area remains in the same configuration, so that they don't need to keep changing things around each time. A found in one session where I had to check every request I sent 20% of the time changing the environment around.
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
02-24-2017
05:33 AM
Submitted by
AlexKaras
on
02-24-2017
05:33 AM
In order to be able to create more real-life test scenarios I would like to ask to make it possible to use variables as operation parameters. For example, a sample scenario is to make a user to order a random number of items. The idea of how to implement this is to record the ordering of one item, add the Loop operation to the scenario and move relevant requests into the loop. The current problem is that the loop can repeat only the fixed number of iterations. Expected improvement is that it will be possible to create a project variable of random type in the range, say, from 1 to 10 and reference this variable as a loop counter. The expected result is that every virtual user will order random number of items in the range between 1 and 10. Thanks, /Alex =========================
... View more
Status:
Accepted for Discussion
Submitted on
01-25-2016
09:38 PM
Submitted by
MichaelPunsky
on
01-25-2016
09:38 PM
Please add an "Errors" section to LoadComplete reports. Currently, there is only a pass/fail section. This tells you how many requests passed and how many failed - but does give a breakdown of the errors showing why they failed. It is important to know if the app was experiencing server error 500's or merely redirects. Things to include: Errors per page chart: Show each page and how many errors it generated Pie chart of error types: Showing the percentage of each error type. Error Detail: Show each error. Include request header, response header, response body (snippet) - this can be limited to the first nn errors.
... View more