The syntax I use in the example is generally usable in either.
One thing I just realized... the example I gave isn't going to work because the extension is written in JScript but I'm depending upon an output parameter. So, what you're going to want to do is probably use the method for the record set as documented in the ReadMe I PM'd to you... That will return the actual SQL records in an ADO record set object that you can then traverse and check for content.
I've created a "bug" in my repository to correct this oversight so that folks can get a "rows affected" response if they want... that is, again, a backlog item for me so it might take a bit. In the meantime, the work around I suggested SHOULD work for you.
