dbattaglia
7 years agoContributor
Vallalarasu_P your suggestion to use an external library to store the object map is a definite possibility but that would be avoiding the feature under discussion here--you would not be using the NameMap feature at all in this case. again, it is doable but there are reasons why we would not want to go this route.
as far as the NameMap update feature recently released, this is super cool but it does not address the functionality asked for in this post: when a NameMap item is updated, run a process to update all references to that item in the test code-base.
let me know if i am misunderstanding you.
thanks,
daniel
Related Content
- 3 years ago
- 6 years ago