Forum Discussion
Hey MarkJohnsonekl
v2.16 of the log4j files are the ones that have had that security hole plugged. Are you saying your security team wont allow v2.16 log4j files?
Cheers,
Rich
- richie3 years agoCommunity Hero
ignore my last -I just saw the post by KarelHusa about the latest security hole for v2.16 log4j
- MarkJohnsonekl3 years agoNew Contributor
My understanding is that 2.16.0 resolved the critical vulnerability that was introduced by 2.14, but - since then - vulnerabilities were discovered in 2.16.0, and one of these has been classified as critical. The known vulnerabilities that exist in 2.16.0 are mediated by 2.17.0. So, our organization only considers 2.17.0 an acceptable remediation.
- MarkJohnsonekl3 years agoNew Contributor
I see form another post that SoapUI OS 5.7.0 is being developed, and will include Log4J 2.17.0. This issue can be closed
- MHutchinson3 years agoOccasional Visitor
It appears that an additional flaw was found in 2.17.0 shortly after release. The current 2.17.1 is the newest version, and is considered standard requirement for us to allow Log4J on a system.
So, is there any information showing that SoapUI 5.7.0 will distribute with 2.17.1?
Related Content
- 4 years ago